📅 Schedule
Review f
Day 3 — Case Practice
Run through practice cases. Add links to cases and track your performance.
Day 4 — Mock Interviews
Schedule mock interviews and fit story rehearsals. Note feedback here.
Day 5 — Final Review
Light review of weak areas. Rest and prepare mentally for interview day.
Day 6 — Interview Day 🏆
Final preparations. Review cheat sheet. You've got this!
🧘 Wellness & Energy
Sleep & Recovery
- Sleep target: 7-8 hours minimum. Consistency is key.
- Interview day: Wake up early, light breakfast, review notes, arrive 15 min early.
- Caffeine: Moderate. Max 2 coffees/day. Nothing after 4pm.
- Exercise: 20-30 min daily walk — reduces
- Exercise: 20-30
Anxiety Management
- Breathing: Box breathing (4-4-4-4) before each session and on interview day.
- Visualization: Spend 5 min visualizing a successful interview.
- Grounding: If anxious, name 5 things you see, 4 you hear, 3 you touch.
- Power posing: 2 min before interview — proven to reduce cortisol.
Every structure must pass all 3 / Toda a estrutura deve passar nos 3:
| English | Português | |
|---|---|---|
| A | Answer-focused — Focus on the right question; provide a prioritized approach to solving it | Focado na resposta — Foca na pergunta certa; abordagem priorizada para a resolver |
| I | Insightful — Tailor structure to the client's specific situation | Perspicaz — Adaptar a estrutura à situação específica do cliente |
| M | MECE — Break down into an exhaustive set of independent drivers | MECE — Dividir num conjunto exaustivo de fatores independentes |
🏭 Select Industry for Examples
Choose an industry to see tailored examples in each framework below.
| Step | English | Português |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Break down into first-level drivers | Dividir em fatores de primeiro nível |
| 2 | Order the 1st level drivers by priority | Ordenar por prioridade |
| 3 | Add depth and insights | Adicionar profundidade e insights |
Two approaches / Duas abordagens:
| Top-Down | Bottom-Up |
|---|---|
|
Break down the problem into components / Decompor o problema
em componentes Leverage the 20+ frameworks / Usar os 20+ frameworks |
Generate ideas that could solve the question / Gerar ideias
que possam resolver a questão Group these ideas into factors / Agrupar ideias em fatores |
| Requires the right logical approach / Requer abordagem lógica | Requires the right insights / Requer os insights certos |
Step 1: List all drivers upfront / Listar todos os fatores à partida
"There are three areas I'd consider. First... Second... Third..."
"Há três áreas que eu consideraria. Primeiro... Segundo... Terceiro..."
Step 2: Signpost before detail / Sinalizar antes do detalhe
"If I go to the first driver — [name] — I think the most important question is..."
"Se for ao primeiro fator — [nome] — a questão mais importante é..."
🏆 Top 10 Case Frameworks (CaseCoach)
-
How to improve profits? / Como melhorar lucros?
-
Revenue / Receitas
- Volume / Volume
- Price / Preço
-
Costs / Custos
- Fixed costs / Custos fixos
- Variable costs / Custos variáveis
-
Revenue / Receitas
"To analyze profitability, I'd break it into revenue and costs. On revenue, I'd look at price and volume. On costs, I'd separate fixed and variable."
"Para analisar a rentabilidade, vou dividir em receitas e custos. Nas receitas, olho para preço e volume. Nos custos, separo fixos e variáveis."
-
How to grow a business? / Como crescer?
-
Grow the core business / Crescer no core
-
Grow across current segments / Crescer nos segmentos
atuais
- Better products / Melhores produtos
- Improved marketing / Marketing melhorado
- Competitive prices / Preços competitivos
- Invest in fastest-growing segments / Investir nos segmentos de maior crescimento
-
Grow across current segments / Crescer nos segmentos
atuais
-
Grow outside of the core / Crescer fora do core
- Sell new products to existing clients / Vender novos produtos a clientes atuais
- Use capabilities to get into new businesses / Usar capacidades para entrar em novos negócios
-
Grow the core business / Crescer no core
-
How to cut costs? / Como reduzir custos?
-
Reduce the need / Reduzir a necessidade
- Eliminate the need entirely / Eliminar totalmente a necessidade
- Reduce the service level / Reduzir o nível de serviço
-
Meet the need with less resource / Cumprir com menos
recursos
- Eliminate waste / Eliminar desperdício
- Improve productivity / Melhorar produtividade
-
Reduce the cost of resources / Reduzir o custo dos
recursos
- Find cheaper alternatives / Encontrar alternativas mais baratas
- Renegotiate costs / Renegociar custos
-
Reduce the need / Reduzir a necessidade
Examples / Exemplos: Self-service portal / Portal self-service, Offshoring, Training / Formação
-
Whether to enter? / Devemos entrar?
-
Market opportunity / Oportunidade de mercado
- Market size / Dimensão do mercado
- Market growth / Crescimento do mercado
-
Potential share / Quota potencial
- Customer needs / Necessidades dos clientes
- Our offering / A nossa oferta
- Competitors / Concorrentes
-
Potential profit / Lucro potencial
- Investment / Investimento
- Running costs / Custos operacionais
- Revenue / Receitas
- Capabilities & risks / Capacidades e riscos
-
Market opportunity / Oportunidade de mercado
-
How to launch? / Como lançar?
-
Choose target segments / Escolher segmentos-alvo
- Size & growth / Dimensão e crescimento
- Competition / Concorrência
- Customer needs / Necessidades dos clientes
-
Define marketing strategy / Definir estratégia de
marketing
- Product / Produto
- Price / Preço
- Distribution / Distribuição
- Promotion / Promoção
-
Implementation / Implementação
- Product design / Design do produto
- Production / Produção
- Marketing & sales / Marketing e vendas
- Logistics / Logística
- Aftercare / Pós-venda
-
Choose target segments / Escolher segmentos-alvo
-
How to price? / Como precificar?
-
Costs / Custos
- Variable costs / Custos variáveis
- Fixed costs / Custos fixos
- Investment costs / Custos de investimento
- Plus enough markup to cover margin / Margem suficiente
-
Competitors or substitutes / Concorrentes ou
substitutos
- Should we price above or below? / Devemos fixar acima ou abaixo?
- Clients' willingness to pay / Disposição a pagar dos clientes
-
Costs / Custos
-
Whether to invest? / Devemos investir?
- Impact on revenue / Impacto nas receitas
- Impact on costs / Impacto nos custos
- Break even? / Ponto de equilíbrio?
- Implementation / Implementação
-
Whether to acquire? / Devemos adquirir?
-
Standalone value / Valor autónomo
- Future revenue / Receitas futuras
- Future cost / Custos futuros
- Valuation multiples / Múltiplos de avaliação
-
Synergies / Sinergias
- Cost reduction / Redução de custos
- Revenue growth / Crescimento de receitas
- Capabilities & risks / Capacidades e riscos
-
Standalone value / Valor autónomo
-
How to respond? / Como responder?
-
Potential impact on our business / Impacto potencial no
nosso negócio
- Segment affected / Segmento afetado
- Size / Dimensão
- Profitability / Rentabilidade
- Estimated loss / Perda estimada
- Opportunity pursued by competitor / Oportunidade do concorrente
-
Possible responses / Respostas possíveis
- Do nothing / Não fazer nada
- Mitigate (retain clients) / Mitigar (reter clientes)
- Replicate (launch competing offer) / Replicar (lançar oferta concorrente)
- Collaborate / Colaborar
- Align (lower prices) / Alinhar (baixar preços)
-
Potential impact on our business / Impacto potencial no
nosso negócio
-
How to optimize? / Como otimizar?
-
Map out current process / Mapear o processo atual
- Capacity? / Capacidade?
- Utilization? / Utilização?
- Bottleneck? / Gargalo?
-
Look into each step / Analisar cada etapa
- Eliminate / Eliminar
- Anticipate / Antecipar
-
Estimate gains / Estimar ganhos
- Reduce cost / Reduzir custo
- Increase quality / Aumentar qualidade
- Increase speed / Aumentar velocidade
-
Map out current process / Mapear o processo atual
| Category / Categoria | English | Português |
|---|---|---|
| Market / Mercado | Geographies, Size & growth, Segments, Distribution channels, Customer segments | Geografias, Dimensão e crescimento, Segmentos, Canais de distribuição, Segmentos de clientes |
| Customers / Clientes | Purchasing decision, Preferences, Substitutes | Decisão de compra, Preferências, Substitutos |
| Competition / Concorrência | New entrants, Market shares, Profitability, Skills, Barriers to entry, Key success factors, Brand, Capital, Partners | Novos entrantes, Quotas de mercado, Rentabilidade, Competências, Barreiras à entrada, Fatores-chave de sucesso, Marca, Capital, Parceiros |
| Macro | Regulation, Political issues, Economy, Unions, Technology, Execution | Regulação, Questões políticas, Economia, Sindicatos, Tecnologia, Execução |
📚 Academic Frameworks / Frameworks Académicos
Price / Quantity equilibrium / Equilíbrio preço / quantidade
Helpful for / Útil para: Price changes / Alterações de preço, Profit forecasting / Previsão de lucro, Operations / Operações, Markets outside of business / Mercados fora do negócio
-
Three Cs
- Company / Empresa (Supply / Oferta)
- Competitors / Concorrentes (Supply / Oferta)
- Customers / Clientes (Demand / Procura)
Helpful for understanding industry attractiveness / Útil para entender a atratividade de uma indústria
-
Five Forces / 5 Forças
- Competitors / Concorrentes
- Customers / Clientes
- Suppliers / Fornecedores
- Substitutes / Substitutos
- New Entrants / Novos Entrantes
| English | Português | Sub-elements / Sub-elementos |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Produto | Features / Características, Design, Branding / Marca |
| Price | Preço | Pricing strategies / Estratégias de preço, Competitiveness / Competitividade |
| Place (Distribution) | Distribuição | Distribution channels / Canais de distribuição, Partnerships / Parcerias |
| Promotion | Promoção | Advertising / Publicidade, Communication / Comunicação, PR / Relações públicas |
🧩 Logical Frameworks / Frameworks Lógicos
| # | Type / Tipo | Best for / Melhor para | Example / Exemplo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equations / Equações | Quantitative questions / Questões quantitativas | Profit = Revenue − Costs / Lucro = Receitas − Custos |
| 2 | Key Questions / Questões-chave | Qualitative decisions / Decisões qualitativas | Do they have track record? Is price competitive? / Têm histórico? O preço é competitivo? |
| 3 | Hypotheses / Hipóteses | Qualitative decisions / Decisões qualitativas | "I should hire X if..." / "Devo contratar X se..." |
| 4 | Root Causes / Causas-raiz | Issue investigations / Investigação de problemas | Why are deliveries delayed? / Porquê atrasos nas entregas? |
| 5 | Process Map / Mapa de Processo | Operations optimization / Otimização de operações | Attraction → Screening → Selection → Offer / Atração → Triagem → Seleção → Oferta |
| 6 | From-To | Reaching a future state / Atingir um estado futuro | Define objective → Establish current state → Measure gap / Definir objetivo → Estado atual → Medir o gap |
🔑 Quick Selection Guide / Guia Rápido de Seleção
| If the prompt mentions... / Se o prompt menciona... | Framework |
|---|---|
| Profits declining / Lucros a cair | #1 Profitability / Rentabilidade |
| Grow, increase revenue / Crescer, aumentar receitas | #2 Growth / Crescimento |
| Reduce costs, efficiency / Reduzir custos, eficiência | #3 Cost Cutting / Redução de Custos |
| Enter a new market / Entrar num novo mercado | #4 Market Entry / Entrada no Mercado |
| Launch a new product / Lançar novo produto | #5 Product Launch / Lançamento |
| Set / change price / Definir preço | #6 Pricing / Preço |
| Should we invest? / Devemos investir? | #7 Investment / Investimento |
| Buy / merge with company / Comprar / fundir | #8 M&A / Aquisição |
| Competitor threat / Ameaça competitiva | #9 Competitive Response / Resposta Competitiva |
| Improve process, operations / Melhorar processo | #10 Process Optimization / Otimização |
| How big is the market? / Qual o tamanho do mercado? | Market Sizing (see Math tab / ver tab Math) |
❌ "I'll use the profitability framework." / "Vou usar o framework de profitability."
✅ "To analyze this, I'd look at two main dimensions: revenue and costs." / "Para analisar isto, proponho olhar para duas dimensões: receitas e custos."
📚 Case Type Playbooks / Playbooks por Tipo de Caso
Default issue trees + high-impact analyses + expected math for each case type / Árvores padrão + análises de alto impacto + math esperada por tipo — from MBB Guide
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
-
Profit Bridge / Ponte de Lucro: Revenue vs Cost /
Receita vs Custo
- Revenue / Receita: Price × Volume → segment by product, customer, channel, geography / segmentar por produto, cliente, canal, geografia
- Cost / Custo: Variable vs Fixed → segment by major cost buckets / custos variáveis vs fixos
- Root causes / Causas-raiz: Market vs company-specific / Mercado vs específico da empresa
High-Impact Analyses / Análises de Alto Impacto:
- Build a profit bridge over time (last year vs this year) / Construir ponte de lucro ao longo do tempo
- Segment profitability: product line, customer, geography / Rentabilidade por segmento
- Price-volume-mix decomposition / Decomposição preço-volume-mix
- Unit economics: contribution margin, break-even, utilization / Economia unitária
Expected Math / Math Esperada:
Profit bridge (absolute + %), contribution margin, break-even, elasticity logic
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
- Market attractiveness / Atratividade do mercado: Size, growth, profit pool, trends, regulation / Tamanho, crescimento, pool de lucro, tendências, regulação
- Competitive dynamics / Dinâmica competitiva: Players, differentiation, barriers, channels / Jogadores, diferenciação, barreiras, canais
- Ability to win / Capacidade de vencer: Capabilities, cost position, brand / Capacidades, posição de custo, marca
- Economics / Economia: Investment, margins, NPV/payback / Investimento, margens, VAL/payback
- Entry strategy / Estratégia de entrada: Build vs partner vs acquire / Construir vs parceria vs adquirir
High-Impact Analyses:
- Market sizing + realistic share capture (bottom-up)
- Profit pool: where money is made across value chain / Onde se ganha dinheiro na cadeia de valor
- Customer needs + willingness to pay / Necessidades do cliente + disposição a pagar
- Entry options comparison: build vs partner vs acquire / Comparação de opções
Expected Math:
Market sizing (customers × frequency × price), investment vs return (payback, NPV), share build-up
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
- Grow in core / Crescer no core: Penetration, frequency, retention, pricing / Penetração, frequência, retenção, preços
- Adjacent expansion / Expansão adjacente: New segments, channels, geographies / Novos segmentos, canais, geografias
- New products/services / Novos produtos/serviços: Innovation, bundling, cross-sell
- Inorganic / Inorgânico: Partnerships, acquisitions / Parcerias, aquisições
- Feasibility / Viabilidade: Capabilities, investment, timing, risks / Capacidades, investimento, timing, riscos
High-Impact Analyses:
- Growth decomposition: market growth vs share vs mix / Decomposição do crescimento
- Customer funnel: awareness → conversion → retention
- Channel economics: CAC vs LTV
- Prioritization matrix: impact × feasibility / Impacto × viabilidade
Expected Math:
Funnel math (conversion rates), LTV vs CAC, incremental profit by initiative
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
- Costs + margin floor / Custos + margem mínima: Variable, fixed, contribution
- Customer willingness to pay / Disposição a pagar: Segments, value drivers, substitutes / Segmentos, drivers de valor, substitutos
- Competition / Concorrência: Market reference prices / Preços de referência
- Strategic objective / Objetivo estratégico: Profit vs share vs positioning
- Price architecture / Arquitetura de preço: Tiers, bundles, discounts / Escalões, pacotes, descontos
Expected Math:
Contribution margin at different prices, break-even for price change, elasticity scenarios
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
- Strategic rationale / Razão estratégica: Why buy vs build vs partner / Porquê comprar vs construir vs parceria
- Target attractiveness / Atratividade do alvo: Financials, assets, customers, risks
- Synergies / Sinergias: Cost + revenue synergies, integration costs / Sinergias de custo + receita, custos de integração
- Valuation / Avaliação: What is it worth to us? / Quanto vale para nós?
- Integration plan / Plano de integração: People, systems, culture, regulators / Pessoas, sistemas, cultura, reguladores
Expected Math:
Synergy sizing (cost + revenue), deal economics (premium vs value creation), payback, simple DCF logic
Default Issue Tree / Árvore Padrão:
- Demand + service levels / Procura + níveis de serviço: Customer needs, variability / Necessidades do cliente, variabilidade
- Capacity + utilization / Capacidade + utilização: Bottlenecks, constraints / Gargalos, restrições
- Process efficiency / Eficiência do processo: Cycle time, waste, rework, yield / Tempo de ciclo, desperdício, retrabalho
- Supply chain / Cadeia de abastecimento: Suppliers, logistics, inventory / Fornecedores, logística, inventário
- Implementation / Implementação: CAPEX, change management, KPIs
Expected Math:
Throughput = capacity of bottleneck, utilization + waiting time, inventory turns, working capital
📋 Case Structuring in Action / Estruturação na Prática
7 example structures from CaseCoach / 7 estruturas exemplo do CaseCoach
Q: Friend created allergen-free snack bar. Help determine the right price. / Amigo criou barra sem alergénios. Ajudar a definir o preço.
-
Target segments / Segmentos-alvo
- a. Corporate clients (airlines, schools) liable for reactions / Clientes corporativos responsáveis por reações
- b. Parents buying for children / Pais a comprar para crianças
- c. Adults buying for themselves / Adultos a comprar para si
- Price of competitors / Preço dos concorrentes (direct + indirect e.g. fresh fruit)
- Perceived value vs alternatives / Valor percebido vs alternativas + potential markup
- Costs / Custos
Q: Water park in Majorca wants to increase profitability. / Parque aquático em Maiorca quer aumentar rentabilidade.
-
Increase revenue / Aumentar receitas
- a. Increase # clients / Aumentar nº clientes: capacity (hours, new rides) + demand (promotions, channels)
- b. Increase spend per client / Aumentar gasto por cliente: prices, add-ons (VIP, restaurants)
-
Decrease costs / Reduzir custos
- a. Decrease service level / Reduzir nível de serviço
- b. Do same with less / Fazer igual com menos (identify waste / identificar desperdício)
- c. Reduce input costs / Reduzir custos de input
Q: Package holiday provider lost 10% bookings. CEO wants turnaround. / Operador turístico perdeu 10% reservas. CEO quer recuperação.
- Focus on most profitable offers / Focar nas ofertas mais rentáveis — reduce least-, increase most-profitable
- Increase profitability across all / Aumentar rentabilidade geral — demand, pricing, costs
- Invest in growth opportunities / Investir em oportunidades de crescimento — UK packages? Lower cost destinations? Cruises? Specialized holidays?
Q: Bristol wants to become Silicon Valley of UK. What does the council need to do? / Bristol quer ser o Silicon Valley do UK.
- Identify target technologies / Identificar tecnologias-alvo — trends, university strengths, employer strengths
-
Strengthen the ecosystem / Fortalecer o ecossistema
- Universities / Universidades — research funding, students / financiamento investigação
- Employers / Empregadores — R&D centers / centros I&D
- Funding / Financiamento — venture funds, investor networks / fundos venture, redes de investidores
- Entrepreneurs / Empreendedores — incubation, training, workspace / incubação, formação, espaço
- Improve location attractiveness / Melhorar atratividade do local — transport, accommodation / transportes, alojamento
Q: Why hasn't social investment fund received more investment? / Por que não recebeu mais investimento?
- Lack of supply / Falta de oferta — limited need from social enterprises, not enough enterprises, lack of asset managers
- Lack of demand / Falta de procura — investors don't know/care, insufficient returns, unfavorable tax
- Lack of intermediation / Falta de intermediação — intermediaries don't distribute/know/promote
Q: Mortgage applications up but completions down. Why? / Candidaturas hipoteca subiram mas completadas desceram.
- Quality of applications / Qualidade das candidaturas — credit-worthiness declining, wages vs property prices
- Our process / O nosso processo — burdensome → abandoned, slow offers
- Our approval rules / As nossas regras de aprovação
- Competitiveness of offers / Competitividade das ofertas — rates, features, brand
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics / Métricas-Chave: | ||
| Same-store sales growth (SSS) | Crescimento vendas mesma loja | Revenue growth at stores open 1+ year; removes effect of new openings |
| Revenue per sqm / sqft | Receita por m² | Sales productivity of floor space; higher = better use of real estate |
| Basket size × Footfall = Revenue | Ticket médio × Tráfego = Receita | Revenue = avg spend per visit × number of visitors |
| Inventory turnover | Rotação de inventário | How many times stock is sold & replaced per year; higher = less capital tied up |
| Gross margin (%) | Margem bruta (%) | Revenue minus COGS as % of revenue; shows product-level profitability |
| Customer acquisition cost (CAC) | Custo aquisição cliente | Total marketing/sales spend ÷ new customers gained |
| Trends / Tendências: | ||
| E-commerce cannibalization of physical stores | Canibalização do e-commerce sobre lojas físicas | Online sales eating into physical store revenue |
| Private label growth (+margin) | Crescimento de marca própria (+margem) | Store's own brand products growing — higher margin than national brands |
| Omnichannel (click & collect, BOPIS) | Omnicanal (compra online, levanta na loja) | Integrating online + physical channels into seamless customer experience |
| Supply chain optimization | Otimização da cadeia de abastecimento | Reducing cost/time from supplier to shelf (logistics, warehousing, procurement) |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) | SKU (Unidade de Manutenção de Stock) | Unique identifier for each product variant (size, color, etc.) |
| Footfall / foot traffic | Tráfego de loja / afluência | Number of people entering a store; key driver of retail revenue |
| Shrinkage (theft/damage loss) | Quebras (perdas por roubo/dano) | Inventory loss from theft, damage, or admin errors; typically 1-3% of sales |
| Planogram (shelf layout) | Planograma (layout de prateleira) | Diagram showing exactly where products go on shelves; optimizes sales per sqm |
| Markdown / clearance | Redução de preço / saldos | Price reductions to clear slow-moving or seasonal stock |
| Sell-through rate | Taxa de venda | % of inventory sold vs received; measures buying accuracy |
| Category management | Gestão de categoria | Managing product groups (dairy, snacks) as strategic business units |
| Stock-out | Rutura de stock | Product unavailable when customer wants it; causes lost sales + brand damage |
| BOPIS (Buy Online, Pick-up In Store) | Compra online, levanta na loja | Customers order online, collect in-store; saves delivery cost |
| Typical Cases: Profitability, pricing strategy, market entry, store footprint optimization | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| R&D pipeline (Phase I-III, approval rate ~10%) | Pipeline I&D (Fase I-III, taxa aprovação ~10%) | Portfolio of drugs in development stages; only ~10% reach market |
| Patent cliff / exclusivity expiry | Queda de patente / expiração exclusividade | When drug patent expires, generics enter → revenue drops 80-90% |
| Gross margin (typically 70-90% for branded drugs) | Margem bruta (tipicamente 70-90% medicamentos de marca) | Pharma has very high gross margins but massive R&D and SGA costs |
| Market access & reimbursement | Acesso ao mercado e reembolso | Whether payers (govt/insurers) will cover the drug and at what price |
| Patient population × Treatment rate × Price = Revenue | Nº pacientes × Taxa tratamento × Preço = Receita | Revenue formula: addressable patients × treatment rate × price per treatment |
| Trends: | ||
| Biosimilars / generics competition | Concorrência de biossimilares / genéricos | Near-copy of a biologic drug after patent expiry; cheaper but not identical |
| Gene therapy & personalized medicine | Terapia genética e medicina personalizada | Tailoring treatment to individual patient genetics/biomarkers |
| Value-based care / outcomes pricing | Cuidados baseados em valor / preços por resultados | Paying providers for outcomes (patient health) not volume of services |
| Digital health / telemedicine | Saúde digital / telemedicina | Remote healthcare via apps/video; growing post-COVID |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| Patent cliff | Queda de patente | When drug patent expires, generics enter → revenue drops 80-90% |
| Formulary (list of approved drugs) | Formulário (lista medicamentos aprovados) | List of drugs approved for reimbursement by a hospital or insurer |
| Clinical trial (Phase I-III) | Ensaio clínico (Fase I-III) | Testing stages: I=safety(20-80), II=efficacy(100-300), III=large-scale(1000+) |
| FDA/EMA approval | Aprovação FDA/EMA | Regulatory approval from US (FDA) or EU (EMA) required before drug can be sold |
| Blockbuster drug (>$1B revenue) | Medicamento blockbuster (>$1B receita) | Drug generating >$1B annual revenue; defines pharma company profitability |
| Biosimilar | Biossimilar | Near-copy of a biologic drug after patent expiry; cheaper but not identical |
| Epidemiology / incidence / prevalence | Epidemiologia / incidência / prevalência | Study of disease frequency; incidence = new cases/year, prevalence = total cases |
| Indication (approved use) | Indicação (uso aprovado) | Specific disease/condition a drug is approved to treat; more indications = more revenue |
| Orphan drug (rare disease) | Medicamento órfão (doença rara) | Treatment for rare diseases (<200K patients); gets special incentives and exclusivity |
| Typical Cases: Drug launch strategy, M&A, market sizing, pricing new therapy | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| MRR / ARR (Monthly/Annual Recurring Revenue) | Receita Recorrente Mensal/Anual | Monthly/Annual Recurring Revenue — subscription revenue that repeats predictably |
| Churn rate (%) | Taxa de abandono (%) | % of customers leaving per period; 5% monthly = losing half your base yearly |
| LTV:CAC ratio (target >3:1) | Rácio LTV:CAC (objetivo >3:1) | Customer lifetime value ÷ acquisition cost; >3:1 means healthy unit economics |
| Net Revenue Retention (NRR) | Retenção Líquida de Receita | Revenue from existing customers incl. upsells minus churn; >100% = growing without new sales |
| Gross margin (SaaS typically 70-85%) | Margem bruta (SaaS tipicamente 70-85%) | Revenue minus hosting/delivery costs; healthy SaaS = 70-85% |
| DAU/MAU ratio | Rácio Utilizadores Diários/Mensais Ativos | Daily vs monthly active users; higher ratio = more engaged, stickier product |
| Trends: | ||
| AI/ML adoption across industries | Adoção de IA/ML entre indústrias | AI changing how products work, compete, and create value across all sectors |
| Cloud migration & SaaS transformation | Migração cloud e transformação SaaS | Moving from on-premise servers to AWS/Azure/GCP; shifts capex to opex |
| Platform economics & network effects | Economia de plataformas e efeitos de rede | Two-sided markets where more users attract more supply and vice versa |
| Cybersecurity spending growth | Crescimento gastos em cibersegurança | Growing fast as threats increase; now a board-level risk priority |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| SaaS (Software as a Service) | SaaS (Software como Serviço) | Software delivered via internet subscription vs one-time license purchase |
| Churn rate | Taxa de abandono / churn | % of customers leaving per period; 5% monthly = losing half your base yearly |
| Freemium model | Modelo freemium | Free basic product, paid premium features; used to drive adoption then convert |
| API (Application Programming Interface) | API | Interface letting software talk to other software; enables integrations & ecosystem |
| Scalability / scale | Escalabilidade / escalar | Ability to grow revenue without proportional increase in costs |
| MVP (Minimum Viable Product) | MVP (Produto Mínimo Viável) | Minimum Viable Product — simplest version released to test market demand quickly |
| Burn rate (monthly cash consumption) | Burn rate (consumo mensal de caixa) | Monthly cash spend / months until money runs out |
| Product-market fit | Adequação produto-mercado | When product satisfies strong market demand; validated by retention and organic growth |
| Cloud-native | Nativo da cloud | Built specifically for cloud infrastructure; auto-scales, resilient, containerized |
| Total Addressable Market (TAM) | Mercado Total Endereçável | Purchase + operating + maintenance + disposal; full lifecycle cost analysis |
| Typical Cases: Growth strategy, pricing model, market entry, M&A of tech startup | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | Margem Financeira Líquida | Difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits |
| Cost-to-Income ratio (CIR) | Rácio Cost-to-Income | Operating costs ÷ income; lower = more efficient; top banks < 50% |
| Assets Under Management (AUM) | Ativos Sob Gestão | Total market value of investments managed; fee revenue = % of AUM |
| Non-Performing Loans (NPL) ratio | Rácio de Crédito Malparado | Non-Performing Loan — borrower missed payments 90+ days; signals credit quality issues |
| Combined ratio (insurance) | Rácio combinado (seguros) | Claims + expenses as % of premium income; <100% = underwriting profit |
| Revenue = Fees + Interest income + Trading | Receita = Comissões + Juros + Trading | Sales productivity of floor space; higher = better use of real estate |
| Trends: | ||
| Fintech disruption (neobanks, BNPL) | Disrupção fintech (neobancos, BNPL) | Startups challenging banks with better UX, lower fees (neobanks, BNPL, crypto) |
| Open banking / PSD2 | Open banking / PSD2 | Regulations forcing banks to share data via APIs; enables fintech innovation |
| ESG investing & green finance | Investimento ESG e finanças verdes | Investing based on Environmental, Social, Governance criteria alongside returns |
| Digital transformation of legacy banks | Transformação digital de bancos tradicionais | Remote healthcare via apps/video; growing post-COVID |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| Underwriting | Subscrição / avaliação de risco | Assessing risk to decide whether to offer insurance/loan and at what price |
| Securitization | Titularização | Bundling assets (loans, mortgages) into tradeable securities; spreads risk |
| Yield curve | Curva de rendimentos | Revenue per passenger per km; higher = better pricing power |
| Risk-weighted assets (RWA) | Ativos ponderados pelo risco | Assets weighted by risk level; determines how much capital bank must hold |
| Basel III / capital requirements | Basileia III / requisitos de capital | Interface letting software talk to other software; enables integrations & ecosystem |
| KYC (Know Your Customer) | KYC (Conhecer o Cliente) | Know Your Customer — verifying client identity to prevent fraud and money laundering |
| Solvency ratio | Rácio de solvência | Measures if company can meet long-term obligations; key for insurers and banks |
| Cross-selling | Venda cruzada | Selling additional products to existing customers; increases revenue per customer |
| Loss ratio (insurance) | Rácio de sinistralidade (seguros) | Insurance claims paid ÷ premiums earned; lower = more profitable underwriting |
| Typical Cases: Cost cutting, digital transformation, M&A, customer retention | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy) | Custo Nivelado de Energia | Levelized Cost of Energy — total lifetime cost ÷ energy produced; compares sources |
| Capacity factor (%) | Fator de capacidade (%) | Actual output ÷ max possible; solar ~25%, wind ~35%, nuclear ~90% |
| EBITDA / MWh | EBITDA / MWh | Upstream (extraction) higher margins but more volatility than downstream (refining) |
| Capex intensity | Intensidade de Capex | Capital expenditure as % of revenue; telecom is capital-heavy (15-25%) |
| Trends: | ||
| Energy transition (fossil → renewable) | Transição energética (fóssil → renovável) | Shift from fossil fuels to renewables driven by climate policy and cost declines |
| Battery storage economics | Economia de armazenamento em baterias | Storing renewable energy for use when unavailable; costs dropping fast |
| Grid modernization & smart grids | Modernização da rede e redes inteligentes | Digitally managed electricity grid that optimizes generation and distribution |
| Carbon pricing / ETS | Preço do carbono / mercado de emissões | Cost per tonne of CO₂ emitted; EU ETS ~€60-90/tonne currently |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| Baseload / peak load | Carga base / carga de ponta | Minimum constant electricity demand; peak = highest demand (evenings, extreme weather) |
| Grid parity | Paridade de rede | When renewable energy costs same as fossil fuels; reached in many markets |
| PPA (Power Purchase Agreement) | Contrato de compra de energia | Power Purchase Agreement — long-term fixed-price electricity contract; de-risks investments |
| Carbon credit / offset | Crédito de carbono / compensação | Cost per tonne of CO₂ emitted; EU ETS ~€60-90/tonne currently |
| Curtailment (production cut) | Corte de produção | Deliberately reducing energy production when supply exceeds demand or grid capacity |
| Decommissioning | Desativação / descomissionamento | Cost to safely shut down old power plants (esp. nuclear); can be billions |
| Interconnector | Interligação | Physical link between electricity grids of different regions/countries; enables trading |
| Renewable energy certificate | Certificado de energia renovável | Government mandate requiring utilities to source X% from renewables |
| Dispatch (energy) | Despacho (energia) | Decision of which power plants to activate and when based on demand and cost |
| Typical Cases: Investment decision, market entry (renewables), cost optimization | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| RPK (Revenue Passenger Kilometers) | RPK (Receita por Passageiro-Km) | Revenue Passenger Kilometre — one paying passenger transported one km; measures traffic |
| Load factor (% seats filled) | Taxa de ocupação (% lugares preenchidos) | % of seats filled; break-even typically 75-80%; higher = more profitable |
| CASK (Cost per Available Seat Km) | CASK (Custo por Lugar-Km Disponível) | Cost per Available Seat Km — total cost ÷ (seats × km); key efficiency metric |
| Yield (revenue per passenger km) | Yield (receita por passageiro-km) | Revenue per passenger per km; higher = better pricing power |
| Revenue = # Passengers × Avg. Ticket × Load Factor | Receita = Nº Passageiros × Ticket Médio × Taxa Ocupação | % of seats filled; break-even typically 75-80%; higher = more profitable |
| Trends: | ||
| Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) | Combustível de aviação sustentável | Biofuel with lower carbon footprint; currently 2-5x costlier than jet fuel |
| Low-cost carrier expansion | Expansão companhias low-cost | LCCs forcing legacy airlines to cut costs or match prices on sensitive routes |
| Dynamic pricing / revenue management | Pricing dinâmico / gestão de receita | Adjusting fares in real-time based on demand, competition, and booking time |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| Hub-and-spoke vs point-to-point | Hub-and-spoke vs ponto-a-ponto | Passengers connect through central hub; vs point-to-point (LCC model) |
| Codeshare agreement | Acordo de codeshare | Two airlines selling seats on same flight under both flight numbers; expands reach |
| Wet lease / dry lease | Wet lease / dry lease | Wet = aircraft with crew included; Dry = just the aircraft, you staff it |
| Slot (takeoff/landing right) | Slot (direito de descolagem/aterragem) | Permission to use airport runway at specific time; limited at congested airports |
| Ancillary revenue (bags, food, seats) | Receita auxiliar (bagagem, comida, lugares) | Non-ticket income (baggage, food, seats); 30-50% of LCC revenue |
| Turnaround time | Tempo de rotação | Time between landing and next takeoff; shorter = more flights per day |
| Block hours (flight time) | Horas de bloco (tempo de voo) | Time gate-to-gate; basis for crew pay and aircraft utilization metrics |
| Yield management | Gestão de yield / pricing dinâmico | Revenue per passenger per km; higher = better pricing power |
| Typical Cases: Route profitability, fleet strategy, pricing, M&A | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) | Eficiência Global de Equipamento | Overall Equipment Effectiveness = Availability × Performance × Quality; world-class 85%+ |
| Capacity utilization (%) | Utilização de capacidade (%) | Actual output ÷ max output; below 70% signals inefficiency or weak demand |
| Unit cost = (Fixed + Variable) / Units | Custo unitário = (Fixos + Variáveis) / Unidades | Revenue & cost per single unit (customer, transaction); must work before scaling |
| Yield rate / Scrap rate | Taxa de rendimento / Taxa de sucata | % of materials wasted in production; reducing scrap directly improves margins |
| Lead time (days) | Prazo de entrega (dias) | Time from order placement to delivery; shorter = more responsive supply chain |
| Trends: | ||
| Reshoring / nearshoring (post-COVID) | Reshoring / nearshoring (pós-COVID) | Moving production back home/closer; driven by supply chain risks post-COVID |
| Industry 4.0 (IoT, automation, digital twins) | Indústria 4.0 (IoT, automação, gémeos digitais) | Smart factories using IoT, AI, robotics for automated manufacturing |
| Lean / Six Sigma optimization | Otimização Lean / Six Sigma | Lean = eliminate waste; Six Sigma = reduce variation; combined for efficiency |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) | Eficiência Global de Equipamento | Overall Equipment Effectiveness = Availability × Performance × Quality; world-class 85%+ |
| Just-in-Time (JIT) | Just-in-Time (produção no momento certo) | Minimal inventory (Toyota model); vs safety stock buffer; trade-off efficiency vs risk |
| Kaizen (continuous improvement) | Kaizen (melhoria contínua) | Japanese philosophy of continuous small improvements; core of lean manufacturing |
| Throughput | Produtividade / rendimento | Rate of production output; units produced per time period through a process |
| WIP (Work in Progress) | Trabalho em curso | Work in Progress — partially completed products; too much WIP = inefficiency |
| Bill of Materials (BOM) | Lista de materiais | Complete list of materials, parts, and quantities to make one product (BOM) |
| Quality assurance (QA) | Garantia de qualidade | Systematic process to ensure products meet defined quality standards (QA) |
| Bottleneck | Gargalo / bottleneck | Over-The-Top services (WhatsApp, Netflix) bypassing traditional telco revenue |
| Capex vs Opex | Capex vs Opex (investimento vs custo operacional) | Capital expenditure as % of revenue; telecom is capital-heavy (15-25%) |
| Typical Cases: Cost reduction, plant investment, supply chain, make vs. buy | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) | Receita Média Por Utilizador | Average Revenue Per User — total revenue ÷ subscribers; pricing power metric |
| Churn rate / subscriber growth | Taxa de churn / crescimento subscritores | % of customers leaving per period; 5% monthly = losing half your base yearly |
| Capex / Revenue ratio | Rácio Capex / Receita | Capital expenditure as % of revenue; telecom is capital-heavy (15-25%) |
| Content cost per subscriber | Custo de conteúdo por subscritor | What a telco/streamer pays for content ÷ subscribers; key ARPU driver |
| Trends: | ||
| 5G rollout & monetization | Implementação 5G e monetização | Next-gen network: faster, lower latency; enables IoT, autonomous vehicles |
| Streaming wars / content bundling | Guerras de streaming / bundling de conteúdo | Combining mobile + broadband + TV in one package; reduces churn, ups ARPU |
| Tower company spin-offs / infrastructure sharing | Spin-offs de empresas de torres / partilha de infraestrutura | Multiple operators sharing same towers; significantly reduces capex |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| MNO (Mobile Network Operator) | Operadora de rede móvel | Mobile Network Operator — owns and operates its own wireless network (vs MVNO) |
| MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator) | Operadora virtual | Mobile Virtual Network Operator — buys wholesale capacity, sells under own brand |
| Spectrum (frequency bands) | Espectro (bandas de frequência) | Price paid for radio frequencies; major investment enabling network capacity |
| OTT (Over-The-Top content) | Conteúdo OTT | Over-The-Top services (WhatsApp, Netflix) bypassing traditional telco revenue |
| Latency | Latência | Data travel time device→server; critical for gaming, video calls, autonomous cars |
| Bandwidth | Largura de banda | Maximum data transfer rate of a network connection; higher = faster internet |
| Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) | Fibra até casa | Running fiber optic directly to homes; highest speed but expensive to deploy |
| Cord-cutting (cancel cable TV) | Corte do cabo (cancelar TV por cabo) | Consumers cancelling traditional cable/satellite TV for streaming services |
| Bundle / unbundle | Pacote / desagregar | Bundling = selling services together (discount); unbundling = selling separately |
| Typical Cases: Growth strategy, pricing tiers, M&A, customer retention | ||
| English | Português | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Key Metrics: | ||
| Impact per $ spent | Impacto por € gasto | Measurable outcomes (lives saved, children educated); proves effectiveness |
| Cost per beneficiary | Custo por beneficiário | Total program cost ÷ people served; key efficiency metric for donors |
| Funding diversification (grants, donations, earned) | Diversificação de financiamento (subsídios, doações, receita própria) | Spreading income across grants, donations, earned revenue; reduces risk |
| Overhead ratio | Rácio de custos administrativos | Admin + fundraising ÷ total spend; donors prefer <20%, but too low hurts effectiveness |
| Trends: | ||
| Outcome-based funding | Financiamento por resultados | Donors pay based on results achieved, not activities performed |
| Public-private partnerships (PPPs) | Parcerias público-privadas (PPPs) | Govt + business + nonprofit collaboration; leverages different strengths |
| Digital transformation of public services | Transformação digital de serviços públicos | Remote healthcare via apps/video; growing post-COVID |
| Vocabulary / Vocabulário: | ||
| Theory of change | Teoria de mudança | Logic model: activities → outputs → outcomes → impact; shows how change happens |
| Donor retention | Retenção de doadores | Cost to get one new donor; analogous to CAC in for-profit world |
| Grant making | Atribuição de subsídios | % of revenue from grants; high dependency = volatility risk |
| Social enterprise | Empresa social | Nonprofits earning revenue through market activities (fair trade, job training) |
| Outcomes framework | Quadro de resultados | Structured model defining what success looks like and how to measure it |
| Beneficiary | Beneficiário | Total program cost ÷ people served; key efficiency metric for donors |
| Capacity building | Capacitação / reforço de capacidades | Strengthening org's ability to deliver (training, systems, governance) |
| Social ROI (SROI) | Retorno Social do Investimento | Nonprofits earning revenue through market activities (fair trade, job training) |
| Scalability (of programs) | Escalabilidade (de programas) | Ability to grow revenue without proportional increase in costs |
| Typical Cases: Resource allocation, program effectiveness, stakeholder strategy | ||
🎯 Quick Reference: When a case mentions...
| Keyword / Palavra-chave | Industry / Indústria | Think about / Pensar em |
|---|---|---|
| "hospital", "drug", "patients" | Healthcare | R&D pipeline, reimbursement, patient pop. |
| "airline", "routes", "fleet" | Airlines | Load factor, CASK, yield |
| "SaaS", "users", "subscription" | Tech | MRR, churn, LTV:CAC |
| "stores", "SKUs", "footfall" | Retail | Basket size, sqm, inventory |
| "factory", "units", "capacity" | Manufacturing | OEE, utilization, unit cost |
| "bank", "loans", "insurance" | Financial | NIM, CIR, NPL |
| "subscribers", "ARPU", "content" | Telecom/Media | Churn, 5G, bundling |
| "renewable", "MW", "grid" | Energy | LCOE, capacity factor, carbon |
| "NGO", "donors", "beneficiaries" | Non-profit | Impact/$ , overhead, PPP |
📏 Market Sizing & Estimations / Dimensionamento de Mercado
⚡ Core Profit Chain / Cadeia de Lucro Fundamental
Know these by heart — they appear in 80%+ of cases / Saber de cor — aparecem em 80%+ dos casos
🇵🇹 Lucro = Receita − Custo
🇬🇧 Revenue = Price × Volume
🇵🇹 Receita = Preço × Volume
🇬🇧 Volume = Market Size × Market Share
— OR — = Customers × Frequency × Price
🇵🇹 Volume = Tamanho do Mercado × Quota de Mercado
— OU — = Clientes × Frequência × Preço
🇬🇧 Cost = Fixed Costs + Variable Costs
🇵🇹 Custo = Custos Fixos + Custos Variáveis
🇬🇧 Contribution Margin = Price − Variable Cost
🇵🇹 Margem de Contribuição = Preço − Custo Variável
✅ Mini Checklist for Every Calculation / Mini Checklist para Cada Cálculo
- State assumptions and rounding / Dizer pressupostos e arredondamentos
- Write the equation first / Escrever a equação primeiro
- Compute step-by-step / Calcular passo a passo
- Say the result with units / Dizer o resultado com unidades
- Interpret / Interpretar: "This means... so..." / "Isto significa... portanto..."
📊 Exhibit Handling in 20 Seconds / Leitura de Exhibits em 20 Segundos
- READ / LER: What is on axes/columns, units, time period, segment / O que está nos eixos/colunas, unidades, período, segmento
- EXTRACT / EXTRAIR: 2-3 insights — trends, deltas, outliers, drivers / tendências, deltas, outliers, drivers
- SO WHAT / E ENTÃO: How this changes the hypothesis or next step / Como isto muda a hipótese ou próximo passo
- ASK / PEDIR: What data you need next / Que dados precisa a seguir
| Top-Down | Bottom-Up | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach / Abordagem | Break down a large number (market, population) / Decompor um número grande (mercado, população) | Extrapolate a small number (observation, locality) / Extrapolar um número pequeno (observação, local) |
| Pros / Vantagens | Gets to right order of magnitude / Ordem de grandeza correta | Very tangible / Muito tangível. Great for sanity checks / Ótimo para verificação |
| Cons / Desvantagens | Intangible / Intangível | Small mistakes are magnified / Pequenos erros são amplificados |
For products that are replaced periodically / Para produtos substituídos periodicamente:
🇵🇹 Vendas = Stock ÷ Vida útil + Crescimento
Example / Exemplo: Cars sold in US / Carros vendidos nos EUA
-
# Cars sold / # Carros vendidos
-
To maintain current stock / Para manter stock atual
- # Cars in US / # Carros nos EUA
- Lifetime of a car / Vida útil do carro
- To increase stock / Para aumentar stock
-
To maintain current stock / Para manter stock atual
Example / Exemplo: Number of cars per household / Número de carros por família
| # Cars / Carros | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Total / Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of households / % famílias | 10% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 100% |
| Weighted / Ponderado | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 |
World & Major Countries / Mundo e Países Principais
| Country / País | Population / População |
|---|---|
| World / Mundo | ~8 billion / mil milhões |
| US / EUA | 330M (~300M) |
| China | 1.4B (~1.5B) |
| India / Índia | 1.4B (~1.5B) |
| Germany / Alemanha | 83M (~80M) |
| UK / Reino Unido | 67M (~70M) |
| Portugal | ~10.3M |
US Demographics & Economics / Demografia e Economia EUA
| Life expectancy / Esperança de vida | ~80 years / anos |
| People per household / Pessoas por família | 2.5 |
| GDP per capita / PIB per capita | $70,000 |
| Median individual income / Rendimento mediano individual | $50,000 |
| Median household income / Rendimento mediano familiar | $75,000 |
| Work hours per year / Horas trabalho por ano | ~2,000 |
Portugal Reference Numbers / Números de Referência Portugal
| Population / População | ~10.3M |
| GDP / PIB | ~€260B / mil milhões |
| GDP per capita / PIB per capita | ~€25,000 |
| Average salary / Salário médio | ~€1,400 gross / bruto |
| Households / Famílias | ~4M |
| Lisbon metro / Lisboa metro | ~3M |
| Porto metro | ~1.7M |
| Tourists per year / Turistas por ano | ~25-30M |
📐 Core Formulas / Fórmulas Essenciais
🇵🇹 BE (unidades) = Custos Fixos ÷ (Preço − Custo Variável por Unidade)
🇬🇧 Contribution Margin = Price − Variable Cost
🇵🇹 Margem de Contribuição = Preço − Custo Variável
🇵🇹 Payback = Investimento Inicial ÷ Fluxo de Caixa Anual
🇵🇹 ROI = (Ganho − Investimento) ÷ Investimento × 100%
Revenue (Receita)− COGS (Custo das Mercadorias Vendidas) = raw materials, direct labor, manufacturing
= Gross Profit (Lucro Bruto)
− OpEx (Custos Operacionais) = salaries, rent, marketing, R&D, admin
= EBIT (Earnings Before Interest & Tax) = Lucro antes de Juros e Impostos
→ Also called Operating Profit / Lucro Operacional
− Interest (Juros) on debt
− Tax (Impostos)
= Net Profit (Lucro Líquido) = what's left for shareholders
EBITDA = EBIT + Depreciation + Amortization (removes non-cash charges → shows cash generation capacity)
🇵🇹 Margem Bruta = (Receita − COGS) ÷ Receita
🇬🇧 Operating Margin = EBIT ÷ Revenue
🇵🇹 Margem Operacional = EBIT ÷ Receita
→ EBIT = Revenue − COGS − OpEx (all operating costs before interest & tax)
🇬🇧 Net Margin = Net Profit ÷ Revenue
🇵🇹 Margem Líquida = Lucro Líquido ÷ Receita
→ Net Profit = EBIT − Interest − Tax (the bottom line, what shareholders keep)
🇬🇧 Contribution Margin = (Price − VC) ÷ Price
🇵🇹 Margem de Contribuição = (Preço − CV) ÷ Preço
| Ratio / Rácio | Benchmark |
|---|---|
| Gross Margin / Margem Bruta | Retail 30-40%, Tech 60-80%, Services 40-60% |
| EBITDA Margin | 15-25% (good / bom) |
| Net Margin / Margem Líquida | 10-20% (good / bom) |
🇵🇹 Crescimento = (Final − Inicial) ÷ Inicial × 100%
CAGR = (Final ÷ Initial)^(1/n) − 1
Rule of 72 / Regra dos 72:
72 ÷ growth rate = years to double / anos para duplicar
| 7% growth / crescimento | → doubles in ~10 years / duplica em ~10 anos |
| 10% | → ~7 years / anos |
| 15% | → ~5 years / anos |
🇵🇹 VAL = Σ [CF_t ÷ (1 + r)^t] − Investimento Inicial
🇬🇧 CLV = Avg Revenue × Margin × Retention Time
🇵🇹 CLV = Receita Média × Margem × Tempo de Retenção
🇬🇧 CAC = Total Marketing+Sales Cost ÷ # New Customers
🇵🇹 CAC = Custo Total Marketing+Vendas ÷ # Novos Clientes
Healthy ratio: CLV÷CAC > 3
🇬🇧 Market Share = Company Sales ÷ Market Sales
🇵🇹 Quota de Mercado = Vendas Empresa ÷ Vendas Mercado
🇬🇧 Elasticity = % Change Quantity ÷ % Change Price
🇵🇹 Elasticidade = % Variação Quantidade ÷ % Variação Preço
|E| > 1: Elastic (price-sensitive) |E| < 1: Inelastic
🧮 Mental Math Shortcuts / Atalhos de Cálculo Mental
Percentages / Percentagens
15% = 10%+5% 20% = ÷5 25% = ÷4
33% = ÷3 50% = ÷2 75% = X − 25%
Multiplication / Multiplicação
×25 = ×100 ÷ 4 ×50 = ×100 ÷ 2
×1.1 = ×1 + 10%
Strategic Rounding / Arredondamento Estratégico
RULE: Always round to simplify. Adjust after if needed. / REGRA: Arredondar SEMPRE. Ajustar depois.
397 → 400 1,243 → 1,250 €4.7M → €5M
💡 Math Tips During the Case / Dicas de Math no Caso
- Round first, adjust after / Arredondar primeiro, ajustar depois: "I'll round to simplify... 397 ≈ 400" / "Vou arredondar... 397 ≈ 400"
- Think aloud / Falar em voz alta: "5M ÷ 200K units gives us €25 per unit" / "5M ÷ 200K unidades dá-nos €25"
- Sanity check: "€25/unit for a premium product seems reasonable" / "€25/unidade para premium parece razoável"
- State implications / Dizer implicações: After every calculation / Após cada cálculo
⚡ CaseCoach Drill Categories / Categorias de Drills CaseCoach
Practice these daily on the platform / Praticar diariamente na plataforma:
| # | Category / Categoria | Description / Descrição | Target / Objetivo |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Structures / Estruturas | Build MECE structures for case prompts / Construir estruturas MECE | 5-10 per session / por sessão |
| 2 | Calculations / Cálculos | Mental math speed drills / Cálculo mental rápido | 15-30 sec each / seg cada |
| 3 | Case Math | Full case math problems / Problemas de math de caso completos | 2-3 min each / min cada |
| 4 | Market Sizing | Bottom-up and top-down estimations / Estimativas bottom-up e top-down | 5 min each / min cada |
| 5 | Charts / Gráficos | Interpret exhibits and extract insights / Interpretar exhibits e extrair insights | 2-3 min each / min cada |
| 6 | Creativity / Criatividade | Brainstorm ideas in structured buckets / Brainstorming em categorias estruturadas | 2 min each / min cada |
📊 Chart Types / Tipos de Gráfico (from CaseCoach)
| Objective / Objetivo | Chart Types / Tipos de Gráfico | Characteristics / Características |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison / Comparação | Bar charts, Harvey balls | Several data series against same axis / Várias séries no mesmo eixo |
| Composition / Composição | Pie chart, Waterfall, Mekko, Area chart, Stacked bar | A total broken into components / Total decomposto em componentes |
| Distribution / Distribuição | Bar chart, Line chart | How many times an event occurs / Frequência de ocorrências |
| Trend / Tendência | Line chart, Dual axis | Time as an axis / Tempo como eixo |
| Relationship / Relação | Scatter plot, Bubble chart | At least 3 dimensions / Pelo menos 3 dimensões |
🔢 Math Exercises / Exercícios de Math
- 10% de €4.500 = ? Ver€450
- 25% de 1.200 = ? Ver300
- €800 × 12 meses = ? Ver€9.600
- €15.000 / 3 = ? Ver€5.000
- Aumento de 20% sobre €500 = ? Ver€600
- €2.400 / 8 = ? Ver€300
- 15% de €6.000 = ? Ver€900
- €350 × 52 semanas = ? Ver€18.200
- €80.000 / 12 meses = ? Ver≈ €6.667
- Desconto de 30% sobre €1.500 = ? Ver€1.050
- Empresa fatura €2M com margem de 15%. Lucro? Ver€300K (€2M × 0.15)
- CF: €500K. CV: €20/unid. Preço: €50/unid. Breakeven? Ver16.667 unid (€500K / €30)
- Investimento: €300K. CF anual: €75K. Payback? Ver4 anos
- 300K clientes × churn 8%/ano. Quantos se perdem? Ver24.000
- Receita: €5M → €8M em 3 anos. Crescimento total? Anual? Ver60% total. Anual ≈ 17%
- Custo produção €40. Margem desejada 60%. Preço venda? Ver€100 (€40/0.4). Atenção: 60% MARGEM ≠ 60% markup!
- Market share 15% de €200M. Receita? Ver€30M
- ROI: Investiu €400K, gerou €560K. ROI? Ver40%
- 5.000 funcionários × €45K/ano. Custo total? Ver€225M
- Redução 12% sobre base de €8M. Poupança? Ver€960K
- CLV: €500/ano receita, 40% margem, 4 anos retenção. CLV? Ver€800
- CAC: €2M marketing, 10K clientes. CAC? CLV/CAC se CLV=€800? VerCAC=€200. CLV/CAC=4.0 (saudável)
- 2.311 potenciais, conversão 5%. Clientes ganhos? Ver≈ 116
- Fábrica: 1.000/dia, 250 dias/ano. Produção anual? Ver250.000 unidades
- Preço +10%, volume -15%. Receita base €10M. Resultado? Ver€9.35M (CAI 6.5%)
- Mercado €500M, cresce 5%/ano. Valor em 3 anos? Ver≈ €579M (×1.157)
- A: €100M receita, 8% margem. B: €60M, 15% margem. Qual gera mais lucro? VerA: €8M. B: €9M. B gera mais!
- Cliente compra 3x/ano, €120 ticket, 35% margem. Se frequência → 4x, ganho incremental? Ver+€42/cliente
- PT: 10M pessoas, 4M famílias, 70% têm carro, 30% têm 2+. Total carros? Ver5.2M carros (2.8M+2.4M)
- Armazém: 500 encomendas/dia, 5% devoluções (€15/cada). Custo anual? (250 dias) Ver€93.750/ano
- Subscrição €10/mês, churn 3%/mês. Vida média? CLV bruto? Ver≈ 33 meses. CLV = €330
- Receita €50M. COGS 55%, OPEX 30%. EBIT? Margem? Ver€7.5M. 15%
- Aquisição €40M. EBITDA alvo €5M. Múltiplo? Sinergias +€2M/ano → múltiplo efetivo? Ver8x. Com sinergias: 5.7x
- 10K clientes. 40% compram A (€100), 35% B (€200), 25% ambos (€280). Receita? Ver€1.8M
- Desconto 15% ↑ volume 25%. Preço €80, volume 100K, CV €30. Vale a pena? VerNÃO. Contribuição cai €5M→€4.75M
- €3M ÷ 6 Ver€500K
- 17% de €400K ≈ Ver≈ €68K
- €85 × 200 Ver€17.000
- €1.2M × 0.35 Ver€420K
- €750K ÷ 25K Ver€30
- €450 × 365 ≈ Ver≈ €164K
- 12% de €55M ≈ Ver≈ €6.6M
- €2.8M - 23% ≈ Ver≈ €2.16M
- 45.000 ÷ 150 Ver300
- €180K × 4.5 Ver€810K
💡 Dicas de Math durante o Caso
- Arredonda primeiro, ajusta depois: "Vou arredondar para facilitar... 397 ≈ 400"
- Fala em voz alta: "5M dividido por 200K unidades dá-nos 25€ por unidade"
- Sanity check: "€25/unidade para um premium parece razoável"
- Simplifica frações: 3/8 → ≈ 37.5% → ≈ 40%
- Usa benchmarks: "€1B mercado × 15% share → €150M"
Key insight: Every case framework is a "zoom-in" on a branch of the Profitability tree. Click any node to see its framework chain and expand the framework tree below.
🇬🇧 EN / 🇵🇹 PT🧠 How to read this map
| Level | Question | Framework |
|---|---|---|
| 0 — Start | "How to improve profits?" | 💰 Profitability (Revenue − Costs) |
| 1 — Revenue | "Volume problem or price problem?" | Volume / Price decomposition |
| 1 — Costs | "Fixed costs or variable costs?" | Fixed / Variable decomposition |
| 2a — Volume | "How to sell more?" | 📈 Growth |
| 2b — Price | "How to optimize price?" | 🏷️ Pricing |
| 2c — Revenue | "How to defend from threats?" | ⚔️ Competitive Response |
| 2d — Costs | "How to reduce costs?" | 📉 Cost Reduction |
| 2e — Costs | "Should we invest to improve?" | 💼 Investment |
| 3a — Growth | "Enter a new market?" | 🚀 Market Entry |
| 3b — Growth | "Launch a new product?" | 🆕 New Product |
| 3c — Growth | "Acquire a company?" | 🤝 M&A |
| 3d — Cost Red. | "Optimize this process?" | ⚙️ Process Optimization |
💡 The Venn Diagram Insight
Think of it as concentric circles: Profitability is the outer ring (every case is ultimately about profit). Inside it, Revenue and Costs are the two halves. Revenue decomposes into Volume and Price; Costs into Fixed and Variable. Each of those leads to specific frameworks. Pricing and Investment cut across both sides. Competitive Response defends revenue when external threats appear.
In an interview: The prompt tells you WHERE in this map you are. "Profits are declining" → start at Level 0. "Should we enter China?" → jump to Level 3a. But always know which outer framework led here — it gives context for your recommendation.
| English | Português | Notas |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Empresa / Companhia | "Empresa" mais comum |
| Market share | Quota de mercado | NUNCA "share de mercado" |
| Value chain | Cadeia de valor | |
| Competitive advantage | Vantagem competitiva | |
| Value proposition | Proposta de valor | OK dizer em EN |
| Competitor | Concorrente | |
| Supplier | Fornecedor | |
| Retail | Retalho | |
| Wholesale | Grossista | "Grossista" é PT-PT |
| Distribution channel | Canal de distribuição | |
| Business model | Modelo de negócio |
| English | Português | Notas |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Receitas / Faturação | "Faturação" muito PT-PT ✅ |
| Profit | Lucro / Resultado | "Resultado líquido" = net profit |
| Loss | Prejuízo | |
| Fixed / Variable costs | Custos fixos / variáveis | |
| Gross / Operating margin | Margem bruta / operacional | |
| Contribution margin | Margem de contribuição | |
| Breakeven | Ponto de equilíbrio | |
| Cash flow | Fluxo de caixa | OK usar "cash flow" |
| Payback period | Período de retorno | OK usar "payback" |
| NPV | Valor atual líquido (VAL) | |
| Balance sheet | Balanço | |
| P&L (Income Statement) | Demonstração de resultados | |
| Assets / Liabilities | Ativo / Passivo | |
| Equity | Capital próprio | |
| Leverage | Alavancagem | |
| Capital / Operating expenditure | CAPEX / OPEX | OK em inglês |
| English | Português |
|---|---|
| Market sizing | Dimensionamento de mercado |
| Growth / Penetration / Retention / Churn rate | Taxa de crescimento / penetração / retenção / cancelamento |
| CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) | Custo de aquisição de cliente |
| CLV (Customer Lifetime Value) | Valor do ciclo de vida do cliente |
| Economies of scale | Economias de escala |
| Synergies | Sinergias |
| Barriers to entry | Barreiras à entrada |
| Bargaining power | Poder negocial |
| Disruption | Disrupção |
| Sustainability | Sustentabilidade |
🗣️ Case Expressions / Expressões durante o Caso
Structuring / Estruturar:
- "To answer this question, I propose analysing three dimensions..." / "Para responder a esta questão, proponho analisar três dimensões..."
- "I'll split my analysis into two main blocks..." / "Vou dividir a minha análise em dois grandes blocos..."
- "My approach would be as follows..." / "A minha abordagem seria a seguinte..."
- "Does this structure make sense? Shall I start with...?" / "Faz sentido esta estrutura? Posso começar por...?"
Making Hypotheses / Fazer hipóteses:
- "My initial hypothesis is that..." / "A minha hipótese inicial é que..."
- "I'll assume that... Does that seem reasonable?" / "Vou assumir que... Parece-lhe razoável?"
Synthesizing / Sintetizar:
- "So, summarizing what we've seen so far..." / "Então, resumindo o que vimos até agora..."
- "Therefore, the main conclusion is that..." / "Portanto, a principal conclusão é que..."
- "In other words, the main driver here is..." / "Ou seja, o driver principal aqui é..."
Recommending / Recomendar:
- "My recommendation would be..." / "A minha recomendação seria..."
- "I would recommend three main actions..." / "Eu recomendaria três ações principais..."
- "There are, however, risks to consider..." / "Há, no entanto, riscos a considerar..."
When you're stuck / Quando ficas preso:
- "Let me take a step back and reframe..." / "Deixe-me recuar um passo e reformular..."
- "May I take a moment to organize my approach?" / "Posso pensar um momento para organizar a minha abordagem?"
- "I'll make an approximation and then refine." / "Vou fazer uma aproximação e depois refinamos."
⚠️ Common Mistakes / Erros Comuns
❌ Don't say / Não digas
- "I'll use profitability" / "Vou usar profitability"
- "Revenue" (alone / sozinho)
- "O market share"
- "I don't know" / "Não sei"
- "That's hard" / "Isso é difícil"
✅ Say instead / Diz antes
- "I'll analyse revenues and costs separately" / "Vou analisar receitas e custos separadamente"
- "Revenues" or "Turnover" / "Receitas" ou "Faturação"
- "Market share" / "A quota de mercado"
- "I'll make an estimate based on..." / "Vou fazer uma estimativa baseada em..."
- "Interesting. Let me think of an approach" / "Interessante. Deixe-me pensar numa abordagem"
📏 Reference Numbers Portugal / Números de Referência Portugal
| Indicator / Indicador | Value / Valor |
|---|---|
| População | ~10.3 milhões |
| PIB | ~€260 mil milhões |
| PIB per capita | ~€25.000 |
| Salário médio mensal | ~€1.400 bruto |
| Salário mínimo | ~€870 (2026) |
| Nº famílias | ~4 milhões |
| Lisboa metro | ~3 milhões |
| Porto metro | ~1.7 milhões |
| Restaurantes | ~40.000 |
| Supermercados | ~3.500-4.000 |
| Farmácias | ~3.000 |
| Turistas/ano | ~25-30 milhões |
What MBB Evaluates / O que a firm avalia:
- Structure / Estrutura — Organize ideas in MECE categories? / Organizas ideias em categorias MECE?
- Breadth / Amplitude — Think in multiple dimensions? / Pensas em múltiplas dimensões?
- Quality / Qualidade — Are ideas sound and actionable? / As ideias fazem sentido e são acionáveis?
- Communication / Comunicação — Present clearly? / Apresentas de forma clara?
📐 Method: Structured "Buckets" / Método: "Buckets" Estruturados
- Ask for 30 seconds / Pede 30 segundos: "Good question. Can I take a moment?" / "Boa pergunta. Posso pensar um momento?"
- Define 3-4 categories / categorias: "I'll organize my ideas into [3/4] categories..." / "Vou organizar em [3/4] categorias..."
- Give 2-3 ideas per category / Dá 2-3 ideias por categoria: Present in structured way / Apresentar estruturadamente
- Prioritize / Prioriza: "I'd highlight [X] and [Y] as highest impact because..." / "Destacaria [X] e [Y] como as de maior impacto porque..."
🔧 Brainstorming Frameworks
-
WHO / QUEM (stakeholders)
- Current clients / Clientes atuais
- New clients / Novos clientes
- Partners / Channels / Parceiros / Canais
- Internal team / Equipa interna
-
WHAT / O QUÊ (what to change / o que mudar)
- Product / Service / Produto / Serviço
- Price / Preço
- Experience / Experiência
- Channel / Distribution / Canal / Distribuição
-
HOW / COMO (mechanisms / mecanismos)
- Technology / Digital / Tecnologia / Digital
- Marketing / Communication / Marketing / Comunicação
- Operational / Operacional
- Partnerships / Parcerias
| Alto Impacto | Baixo Impacto | |
|---|---|---|
| Fácil | ⭐ QUICK WINS | Nice-to-have |
| Difícil | Projetos grandes | ❌ Ignorar |
-
INTERNAL / INTERNO (we control / controlamos)
- Product / Service / Produto / Serviço
- Processes / Processos
- People / Team / Pessoas / Equipa
- Technology / Tecnologia
-
EXTERNAL / EXTERNO (we influence / influenciamos)
- Clients / Clientes
- Market / Competition / Mercado / Concorrência
- Regulation / Regulamentação
- Partnerships / Parcerias
-
SHORT / CURTO (0-3 months / meses)
- Quick wins, low-hanging fruit
- Quick optimizations / Otimizações rápidas
-
MEDIUM / MÉDIO (3-12 months / meses)
- New processes, channels / Novos processos, canais
- Operational changes / Mudanças operacionais
-
LONGO (1-3+ anos)
- Novos produtos/mercados
- Transformação digital, M&A
💡 Exemplo Completo
Pergunta: "Como pode um banco aumentar a receita?"
"Vou organizar as minhas ideias em três dimensões: clientes, produtos e canais.
1. Clientes: Adquirir novos (campanhas segmentadas, referral), aumentar utilização dos atuais (cross-selling crédito → seguros), reduzir churn (fidelização).
2. Produtos: Lançar novos (robô-advisor, conta digital jovens), repricing (comissões, spreads), serviços de valor acrescentado (consultoria financeira).
3. Canais: Expandir digital (app, onboarding online), parcerias (fintechs, embedded finance), expandir rede em zonas subservidas.
Priorizaria cross-selling a existentes e expansão digital, por melhor rácio impacto vs. investimento."
🎯 Pratica (2 min cada)
- How to reduce food waste in a supermarket? / Como reduzir desperdício alimentar num supermercado?
- How can an airline retain more customers? / Como pode uma companhia aérea reter mais clientes?
- What ways can a hospital reduce wait times? / Que formas tem um hospital de reduzir tempos de espera?
- How can a fashion brand become more sustainable? / Como pode uma marca de moda tornar-se mais sustentável?
- What ways can a municipality attract more tourists? / De que formas pode um município atrair mais turistas?
🔄 Universal Case Flow / Fluxo Universal do Caso
Memorize this — it works for almost every case / Memorizar — funciona para quase todos os casos
| Step / Passo | What You Do / O que fazes | What You Say / O que dizes |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Clarify / Clarificar (30-60s) | Lock metric, time horizon, scope, constraints / Fixar métrica, horizonte, âmbito, restrições | "Just to confirm, success means X by Y, within Z constraints. Is that right?" / "Só para confirmar, sucesso significa X até Y, com Z restrições. Correto?" |
| 2. Structure / Estruturar (60s) | MECE issue tree covering the problem / Árvore de questões MECE | "I'll break this into A, B, C. I'll start with A because it's likely the biggest driver." / "Vou dividir em A, B, C. Começo por A porque é o maior driver." |
| 3. Hypothesize / Fazer hipótese | Pick a likely answer and test it / Escolher resposta provável e testar | "My initial hypothesis is X. I'll validate by checking 1, 2, 3." / "A minha hipótese inicial é X. Vou validar verificando 1, 2, 3." |
| 4. Analyze / Analisar | 2-3 killer analyses, quant where possible / 2-3 análises decisivas, quantificar | "The data suggests the main driver is... so the priority should be..." / "Os dados sugerem que o driver principal é... logo a prioridade deveria ser..." |
| 5. Synthesize / Sintetizar | Mini-summaries every 5-7 min / Mini-sumários a cada 5-7 min | "So far we learned A and B, which implies C. Next I'll test D." / "Até agora vimos A e B, o que implica C. A seguir vou testar D." |
| 6. Recommend / Recomendar | Answer + numbers + rationale + risks + next steps / Resposta + números + razão + riscos + próximos passos | "I recommend X because 1, 2, 3. Impact is Y. Risks are R, mitigated by M." / "Recomendo X porque 1, 2, 3. Impacto é Y. Riscos R, mitigados por M." |
🎤 Final Recommendation Structure (CEO-Ready) / Estrutura da Recomendação Final
- Answer first / Resposta primeiro: Yes/no or do/don't, plus the main action / Sim/não e ação principal
- Quantified impact / Impacto quantificado: Profit, revenue, costs, NPV, payback, timeline
- Top 2-3 reasons / 2-3 razões principais: Each backed by evidence / Cada uma suportada por evidência
- Risks and mitigations / Riscos e mitigações: Show you're not naive / Mostrar que não és naïf
- Next steps / Próximos passos: What you'd do in week 1 and month 1 / Semana 1 e mês 1
💀 Mistakes That Sink Strong Candidates / Erros que Afundam Candidatos Fortes
- Framework dumping: Reciting Porter and 4Ps without relevance / Recitar Porter e 4Ps sem relevância
- No synthesis until the end / Sem síntese até ao fim
- Analysis without linking to decision / Análise sem ligar à decisão
- Overcomplicating math / Complicar a matemática: Losing track of units / Perder unidades
- Not segmenting / Não segmentar: Averages hide the truth / Médias escondem a verdade
- Weak close / Fecho fraco: No numbers, no risks, no next steps / Sem números, sem riscos, sem próximos passos
✅ Self-Review Checklist (After Every Case) / Checklist de Auto-Revisão
- Did I clarify success metric and constraints? / Clarifiquei a métrica de sucesso e restrições?
- Was my structure MECE and tailored (not generic)? / A estrutura foi MECE e personalizada?
- Did I lead with a hypothesis and update it? / Comecei com hipótese e atualizei?
- Did I prioritize 2-3 analyses that change the decision? / Priorizei 2-3 análises que mudam a decisão?
- Did I synthesize along the way? / Sintetizei ao longo do caminho?
- Was my recommendation quantified and actionable (risks + next steps)? / A recomendação foi quantificada e acionável?
🎯 Format / Formato (Interview Round)
-
INTERVIEW 1 / ENTREVISTA 1 (45 min)
-
Fit: 10-15 min
- 1-2 questions / perguntas
-
Case / Caso: 25-30 min
- Full case / Caso completo
-
Fit: 10-15 min
-
INTERVIEW 2 / ENTREVISTA 2 (45 min)
-
Fit: 10-15 min
- 1-2 questions (different) / perguntas (diferentes)
-
Caso: 25-30 min
- Tipo diferente
-
Fit: 10-15 min
Cada entrevistador avalia independentemente e depois comparam notas.
📊 Tipos de Caso Favoritos MBB
🔑 Pesos de Avaliação
Structured Thinking / Pensamento Estruturado — 45%
Custom MECE framework. Clear and concise. Max 2 min. / Framework MECE personalizado. Claro e conciso. Máx 2 min.
Quantitative Analysis / Análise Quantitativa — 25%
Fast, correct calculations. Interpret numbers. Sanity check. / Cálculos rápidos e corretos. Interpretar os números.
Business Judgment — 15%
Hipóteses sensatas. Priorização. Recomendações fundamentadas.
Communication / Comunicação — 15%
Frequent synthesis. Top-down storytelling. Confidence. / Síntese frequente. Confiança.
📋 Perfect Case Flow / Flow de Caso Perfeito
Listen / Ouvir (1 min)
Listen, take notes. Repeat problem. Clarify: objective, definition, scope. / Escutar, tomar notas. Repetir problema. Clarificar: objetivo, definição, âmbito.
Structure / Estruturar (2 min)
Ask for a moment. CUSTOM framework. Initial hypothesis. "I'd propose analyzing 3-4 dimensions..." / Pedir momento. Framework PERSONALIZADO. Hipótese inicial. "Proponho analisar em 3-4 dimensões..."
Analyze / Analisar (15-20 min)
Hypothesis-driven. Request data. Math out loud. Synthesize after each block. Brainstorm when appropriate. / Pedir dados. Math em voz alta. Sintetizar após cada bloco.
Recommend / Recomendar (2-3 min)
Top-down: Recommendation → 3 reasons → Next steps → Risks. / Recomendação → 3 razões → Próximos passos → Riscos.
📋 CaseCoach Scoring Rubric / Rubrica de Avaliação (1-3-5)
| Dimension / Dimensão | 1 (Below / Abaixo) | 3 (Meets Standard / Cumpre) | 5 (Stands Out / Destaca-se) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structuring / Estruturação | Did not offer clear structure / Não apresentou estrutura clara | Clarified ambiguity; MECE set of independent drivers / Clarificou ambiguidades; fatores MECE independentes | Prioritized steps; shared helpful insights / Passos priorizados; partilhou insights úteis |
| Math | Made mistakes, needed help / Erros, precisou de ajuda | Calculated correctly and confidently; stated implications / Calculou corretamente e com confiança; declarou implicações | Clear efficient approach; calculated particularly quickly / Abordagem clara e eficiente; calculou muito rapidamente |
| Judgement & Insights / Julgamento e Insights | Missed key insights / Perdeu insights-chave | Connected findings to develop sound recommendations / Ligou achados para recomendações sólidas | Processed info quickly; shared deep insights and far-reaching implications / Processou info rapidamente; insights profundos |
| Creativity / Criatividade | Struggled to generate ideas / Dificuldade em gerar ideias | Shared numerous, varied and sound ideas / Partilhou ideias numerosas, variadas e sólidas | Exceptional creativity in structured way / Criatividade excecional de forma estruturada |
| Synthesis / Síntese | No clear recommendation / Sem recomendação clara | Supported recommendation with key points + next steps / Recomendação apoiada em pontos-chave + próximos passos | Particularly convincing / Particularmente convincente |
| Case Leadership / Liderança de Caso | Appeared passive or lost / Pareceu passivo ou perdido | Built on findings; stayed focused; made reasonable assumptions / Construiu sobre achados; focado; pressupostos razoáveis | Progressed quickly; asked probing questions; adapted approach / Avançou rapidamente; perguntas incisivas; adaptou abordagem |
🤝 Fit Scorecard / Rubrica Fit (1-3-5)
| Dimension / Dimensão | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapport-building | Failed to set stage / Não iniciou bem | Maintained fluid back-and-forth / Conversa fluida | Made personal connection; authentic; revealed unique traits / Conexão pessoal; autêntico |
| Performance Track Record / Histórico | Did not demonstrate top performance / Não demonstrou performance | Provided evidence of top performance / Provou alta performance | Presented demanding environment; not boastful / Ambiente exigente; sem se gabar |
| Transferable Abilities / Capacidades Transferíveis | Did not demonstrate target abilities / Não demonstrou capacidades | Showed ambition, initiative, persistence, adaptability, leadership, teamwork, persuasion / Mostrou ambição, iniciativa, persistência, adaptabilidade, liderança, trabalho em equipa, persuasão | Impressive achievements; detailed own actions and thought process / Feitos impressionantes; detalhou ações e raciocínio |
| Motivation / Motivação | No good reason for pursuing this / Sem boa razão | Convincing rationale for consulting + this firm / Racional convincente para consultoria + esta firma | Explained in personal terms; evidence of self-development / Explicou pessoalmente; prova de autodesenvolvimento |
✨ General Impression / Impressão Geral (both scorecards / ambas as rubricas)
| Dimension / Dimensão | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presence / Presença | Was not professional / Não foi profissional | Professional, engaging, energetic and confident / Profissional, envolvente, energético e confiante | Built genuine rapport; positive personality; expert-like credibility / Rapport genuíno; personalidade positiva; credibilidade de especialista |
| Communication / Comunicação | Unclear and scattered / Pouco claro e disperso | Listened well; spoke precisely and concisely / Ouviu bem; falou precisa e concisamente | Particularly organized; main idea before details; communicated visually / Muito organizado; ideia principal primeiro; comunicou visualmente |
⚠️ Red Flags
❌ AVOID / EVITAR
- Analyse without structuring / Analisar sem estruturar
- Generic framework / Framework genérico
- Silent calculations / Contas em silêncio
- Only one recommendation / Só uma recomendação
- Being passive / Ser passivo
- Ignoring new data / Ignorar dados novos
✅ DO / FAZER
- Always structure first / Sempre estruturar primeiro
- Custom framework / Framework personalizado
- Think out loud / Raciocínio em voz alta
- 3 points + steps + risks / 3 pontos + steps + riscos
- "I propose looking at X" / "Proponho olhar para X"
- Adapt hypothesis / Adaptar hipótese
🇵🇹 Hot Topics Portugal / Tópicos Quentes Portugal
- Tourism / Turismo: post-COVID recovery, overtourism Lisbon/Porto / recuperação pós-COVID, overtourism Lisboa/Porto
- Energy / Energia: energy transition, renewables (PT wind leader) / transição energética, renováveis (PT líder em eólica)
- Real Estate / Imobiliário: housing crisis, golden visa, rental market / crise habitação, golden visa, arrendamento
- Tech: [major events], startup ecosystem Summit, ecossistema startup Lisboa
- Healthcare / Saúde: NHS under pressure, private sector opportunities / SNS sob pressão, oportunidades no privado
- Retail / Distribuição: Jerónimo Martins vs. Sonae
- Banking / Banca: digitalisation, neobanks, consolidation / digitalização, neobancos, consolidação
- Industry / Indústria: reshoring, automation, paper/cork / reshoring, automação, papel/cortiça
Plataforma CaseCoach — O que tens disponível
| Recurso | Conteúdo | Prioridade MBB |
|---|---|---|
| 📹 Case Interview Prep Course | 19 aulas, 4h10 (stated) → ~7-8h reais | CRÍTICO |
| 📹 Case Math Course | 21 aulas, 3h52 (stated) → ~6-7h reais | CRÍTICO |
| 📹 Fit Interview Prep Course | 7 aulas, 1h07 (stated) → ~2h reais | IMPORTANTE |
| 📚 Case Library | 100+ casos com soluções top-tier | CRÍTICO |
| 🤝 Practice Room | Mock interviews ilimitadas com parceiros | CRÍTICO |
| ⚡ Drills | 6 categorias: Structures, Case Math, Market Sizing, Calculations, Charts, Creativity | CRÍTICO |
| 📹 Sample Interviews | 20+ entrevistas reais com feedback de ex-interviewers | IMPORTANTE |
⏱️ Tempo Real dos Vídeos
Os vídeos CaseCoach demoram 1.5-2× mais do que o tempo indicado porque:
- Pausar para tomar notas e absorver frameworks
- Rebobinar secções complexas (math, structures)
- Praticar técnicas imediatamente após cada aula
- Testar conceitos (escrever estrutura de memória)
Factor de ajuste usado: 1.7× para courses, 1.3× para sample interviews
📹 Plano de Estudo — Video Courses
Prioridade máxima. Cobre todas as 6 dimensões que a MBB avalia.
| Bloco | Aulas (est.) | Tempo Real | Quando |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Estruturação | Intro + Structuring (3-4 aulas) | ~1.5h | Domingo |
| 2. Math & Análise | Math in cases + Exhibits (3-4 aulas) | ~1.5h | Segunda manhã |
| 3. Criatividade & Judgment | Creativity + Insights (3-4 aulas) | ~1.5h | Segunda tarde |
| 4. Síntese & Leadership | Synthesis + Case Leadership (3-4 aulas) | ~1.5h | Terça manhã |
| 5. Sample Interviews | Full case examples + feedback (4-5 vídeos) | ~2h | Terça/Quarta |
Área fraca declarada. Investir tempo sério aqui.
| Bloco | Tópicos | Tempo Real | Quando |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Fundamentos | 4 operações, frações, percentagens, potências | ~1.5h | Domingo noite |
| 2. Conceitos-chave | Weighted averages, growth rates, breakeven | ~1.5h | Segunda |
| 3. Pro Tips | Atalhos, arredondamento, zeros, simplificação | ~1.5h | Terça |
| 4. Business Math | P&L, investimentos, valuations, NPV/ROI | ~2h | Terça/Quarta |
MBB usa formato de fit clássico (background + behavioral + motivation). Relevante para preparar:
| Aula | Tópico | Ação pós-aula |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 | Como te apresentar + background | Escrever intro de 45 seg em PT |
| 3-4 | Behavioral questions + achievement stories | Selecionar 5-6 histórias + praticar em voz alta |
| 5-6 | Motivation (Why consulting? Why this firm?) | Refinar "Why [firm]?" script |
| 7 | Sample fit interviews com feedback | Observar timing, tom, concisão |
Melhor timing: Terça à noite ou Quarta de manhã
⚡ Drills — Plano de Treino
Target mínimo: 50+ drills antes de Sexta
Os drills são rápidos (2-5 min cada). Podem ser feitos em sessões de 15-30 min entre outras atividades.
| Categoria | O que treina | Prioridade | Target | Quando |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏗️ Structures | Criar frameworks MECE custom para prompts de caso | MÁXIMA | 15+ drills | Diariamente |
| 🔢 Calculations | Cálculos rápidos sob pressão | MÁXIMA | 15+ drills | Diariamente |
| 📊 Case Math | Math aplicada a contextos de caso | MÁXIMA | 10+ drills | Seg-Qua |
| 📏 Market Sizing | Estimativas rápidas com sanity check | ALTA | 5+ drills | Seg-Ter |
| 📈 Charts | Interpretar gráficos e extrair insights | ALTA | 5+ drills | Ter-Qua |
| 💡 Creativity | Brainstorming estruturado | ALTA | 5+ drills | Qua-Qui |
📋 Drill Schedule Template (15-20 min/sessão)
- Warm-up: 3 calculations rápidos (3 min)
- Main: 3 structures OU 3 case math (9 min)
- Cool-down: 1 market sizing OU 1 chart (5 min)
Repetir 2-3× por dia entre casos e vídeos
🏗️ Structures Drill — Deep Dive
O drill mais importante para a MBB (45% da avaliação = pensamento estruturado).
- O exercício: Receber prompt de caso → Criar framework MECE em 2 min → Comparar com solução CaseCoach
-
Target: Framework personalizado (NÃO genérico)
que passa o teste AIM:
- Answer-focused — Identifica o objetivo e como o resolver
- Insightful — Tailored ao caso específico, não reutilizável
- MECE — Mutuamente exclusivo, coletivamente exaustivo
- Benchmark: Saiti (MBB, Yale): "structuring drills foram os mais úteis"
📚 Case Library — Casos Recomendados
Estratégia: Escolher casos por tipo favorito MBB
MBB testa predominantemente: Profitability (20%), Revenue Growth (15%), Market Entry (12%), Cost Cutting (10%), Operations (9%). Escolher casos que treinem estas áreas.
| Caso CaseCoach | Tipo | Dificuldade | Porquê | Quando |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roko Hotel | Profitability | Easy | Warm-up perfeito, hotel → turismo PT relevant | Domingo/Segunda |
| Clean-All | Growth Strategy | Easy | Crescimento + ameaça de novos entrantes | Segunda |
| FlashFash | M&A | Medium | Aquisição — tipo comum MBB, vídeo incluído | Terça |
| Canadian Wildlife Fed. | Strategy | Medium | Non-profit — tipo não convencional (MBB testa cada vez mais) | Terça |
| A-EYE | Pricing | Medium | Tech + Pricing — dois favoritos MBB numa pancada | Quarta |
| Fruit Nation | Market Entry | Medium | Entrada no mercado chinês — stretch em math + judgment | Quarta |
+ 10 casos adicionais conforme disponibilidade na Practice Room (parceiros escolhem)
📋 Como usar um caso CaseCoach (solo)
- Ler prompt (1 min) — tomar notas como se estivesses a ouvir o entrevistador
- Estruturar (2 min, timer!) — framework MECE personalizado no papel
- Resolver (20-25 min) — seguir o flow do caso, fazer toda a math em voz alta
- Sintetizar (2 min) — recomendação top-down com 3 razões + riscos
- Comparar com solução (10 min) — anotar: onde a estrutura difere? O que faltou? Math correta?
- Registar 3 takeaways (2 min) — o que vou fazer diferente no próximo caso?
🤝 Practice Room — Mock Interviews
Target: Mínimo 6-8 sessões na Practice Room + 3-4 com amiga PT
CaseCoach recomenda 25+ sessões para candidatos que recebem oferta. Com o tempo disponível, maximizar qualidade.
🗓️ Sessões Planeadas
| Dia | Parceiro | Tipo Caso | Foco Especial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seg manhã | CaseCoach partner | Profitability | Estruturação + math setup |
| Seg tarde | CaseCoach partner | Market Entry / Growth | Criatividade + hipótese |
| Ter manhã | CaseCoach partner | Operations / Pricing | MBB favorites |
| Ter noite | 🇵🇹 Amiga PT | Profitability (em PT) | Comunicação em português |
| Qua manhã | CaseCoach partner | MBB-style (interviewer-led) | Simulação realista |
| Qua tarde | CaseCoach partner | Cost Reduction / M&A | Criatividade + judgment |
| Qua fim dia | 🇵🇹 Amiga PT | Market Entry (em PT) | Mock duro, feedback brutal |
| Qui manhã | 🇵🇹 Amiga PT (Mock 1) | MBB-style completo | Condições reais: timer, sem notas, formal |
| Qui tarde | 🇵🇹 Amiga PT (Mock 2) | Tipo diferente em PT | Entrevistadora tough |
📋 Practice Room — Best Practices
- Antes da sessão: Agendar 5 min antes para prep mental. Ter papel A4 e caneta prontos.
- Durante: Tratar como REAL — timer de 30 min, estruturar formalmente, math em voz alta
- Feedback: Pedir feedback em 3 dimensões: Estrutura, Math, Comunicação
- Depois: Anotar 3 coisas a melhorar. Não fazer mais que 3 casos seguidos (fadiga = maus hábitos)
- Dica: MBB usa maioritariamente candidate-led cases — pedir ao partner para te deixar liderar
📺 Sample Interviews — O que Ver
CaseCoach tem 20+ sample interviews com candidatos reais que entraram em MBB. Priorizar:
| Prioridade | O que ver | Tempo est. | Aprendizagem |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-2 full case interviews (alta performance) | ~40 min | Ver flow perfeito: estrutura → análise → síntese |
| 2 | 1 fit interview example | ~20 min | Timing, tom, profundidade das histórias |
| 3 | 1 case com feedback detalhado | ~30 min | Entender scoring, red flags, green flags |
Melhor timing: Ver 1 sample no Domingo (motivação) + 1-2 na Terça/Quarta (calibrar performance)
🔍 Research Target Firm — Target Firm & Office
CaseCoach recomenda: 1h de research antes da entrevista
Investigar a firma a fundo faz diferença tanto no fit ("Why [firm]?") como nos casos (contexto, tópicos quentes).
📋 Checklist de Research Target Firm
- [Firm] Portugal — quem são os partners, que projetos recentes
- Firm website: casos de estudo públicos em Portugal/Ibéria
- Digital/tech arms — oferta digital (relevante p/ teu perfil tech)
- Cultura da firma — diversidade, strengths-based feedback, ambiente colaborativo
- LinkedIn: 3-4 perfis de consultores da firma/Portugal → background, projetos
- Notícias recentes [Firm] Portugal (últimos 3 meses)
- Setores fortes [Firm] Portugal: energia, banca, retalho, turismo
- Preparar 2-3 perguntas genuínas para o entrevistador sobre a firma
🇵🇹 [Firm] Portugal — Quick Facts para a Entrevista
- Escritório: Lisboa (Avenida Eng. Duarte Pacheco / área do Marquês)
- Fundação PT: Escritório mais recente da firma na Ibéria
- Digital arm: Braço digital/tech — IA, analytics, digital transformation
- Setores foco: Energia, Financial Services, TMT, Consumer, Public Sector
- Diferenciador: Strengths-based feedback, cultura sem imposição de conformismo, colaborativo
- 3 qualities MBB procura: Intellectual curiosity, Creative thinking, Integrity, Drive, Collaborative mindset
📝 Preparar Achievement Stories
CaseCoach Prep Calendar Task: "Prepare your achievement stories"
Selecionar 5-6 histórias fortes e preparar com o framework SCAR (não STAR — CaseCoach method):
| Passo | O que é | Tempo alvo |
|---|---|---|
| S Situação | Onde, quando, contexto (2-3 frases). Qualquer pessoa percebe. | 10-15 seg |
| C Complicação | O grande problema, o turn of events, a dificuldade. Hook do interesse. | 10-15 seg |
| A Ação | O que TU fizeste — 3-5 ações específicas, primeira pessoa. O BULK da história. | 60-90 seg |
| R Resultado | Resultado QUANTIFICÁVEL + o que aprendeste. | 15-20 seg |
As tuas melhores histórias (bancos para escolher)
| História | Dimensão MBB | Resultado-chave |
|---|---|---|
| [Company A] — Founder, sales team | Leadership + Drive | €41.2K revenue, 11 meses, exit |
| [Company B] — Major presentation | Impact + Communication | [significant savings] identified |
| Amazon — Benchmark 21× acima | Performance + Analytics | De -56% para +25% (turnaround) |
| [Company A] — Co-founder exit | Resilience + Integrity | Decisão difícil, exit negociado |
| NOVA Social Consulting — 23 voluntários | Teamwork + Collaborative | Liderança voluntária, impacto social |
| EY — Equipa auditoria | Working under pressure | Coordenação, deadlines, stakeholders |
📅 CaseCoach — Plano Diário Integrado
| Hora | CaseCoach Activity | Detalhes |
|---|---|---|
| 16:00-17:00 | 📹 Case Prep Course: Bloco 1 (Structuring) | 3-4 aulas iniciais + notar takeaways |
| 21:30-22:30 | 📹 Case Math Course: Bloco 1 (Fundamentos) | Rever operações, frações, percentagens |
| 23:00-00:00 | 📚 Caso Solo: Roko Hotel (Profitability) | Caso fácil de warm-up + comparar com solução |
| Hora | CaseCoach Activity | Detalhes |
|---|---|---|
| 10:15-11:15 | 📹 Case Prep Course: Bloco 2 (Math & Exhibits) | + 5 Structures drills após |
| 11:15-12:15 | 📚 Caso Solo: Clean-All (Growth) | Praticar growth framework |
| 12:30-13:30 | 📹 Case Prep Course: Bloco 3 (Creativity & Judgment) | + 5 Creativity drills após |
| 14:00-15:00 | 🤝 Practice Room: Profitability | TU lideras. Pedir feedback em estruturação. |
| 15:30-16:30 | ⚡ Drills: Calculations + Case Math | 10 calculations + 5 case math |
| 18:00-19:00 | 🤝 Practice Room: Market Entry/Growth | Tipo diferente. Foco em criatividade. |
| Hora | CaseCoach Activity | Detalhes |
|---|---|---|
| 10:15-11:00 | 📹 Case Prep Course: Bloco 4 (Synthesis & Leadership) | + rever 1 sample interview |
| 11:00-12:00 | 🤝 Practice Room: Operations/Pricing | MBB favorites. Praticar hipótese inicial. |
| 12:30-13:30 | 📹 Case Math Course: Blocos 2-3 (Conceitos + Pro Tips) | Weighted averages, breakeven, atalhos |
| 14:00-15:00 | 📚 Caso Solo: FlashFash (M&A) ou Canadian Wildlife | Caso médio. Seguir protocol completo. |
| 17:00-17:30 | ⚡ Drills: Structures + Charts | 5 structures + 3-4 chart interpretation |
| 18:00-19:00 | 🇵🇹 Mock com amiga (usando caso CaseCoach) | Caso profitability em PT. Full flow. |
| 20:30-21:30 | 📹 Fit Prep Course (4 aulas) | Background intro + behavioral questions |
| Hora | CaseCoach Activity | Detalhes |
|---|---|---|
| 10:15-10:45 | ⚡ Drills: 5 Structures speed round | 2 min cada. Timer estrito. |
| 10:45-12:00 | 🤝 Practice Room: MBB-style interviewer-led | Simulação mais realista. Feedback detalhado. |
| 12:15-13:15 | 🤝 Practice Room: Cost Reduction / M&A | Foco em CRIATIVIDADE brainstorming |
| 14:00-15:00 | 📹 Case Math Course: Bloco 4 (Business Math) | P&L, investimentos, valuations — último bloco |
| 15:00-16:00 | 🇵🇹 Mock com amiga: A-EYE ou Fruit Nation | Caso médio em PT. Entrevistadora dura. |
| 17:00-17:30 | 📹 Fit Prep Course (3 últimas aulas) | Motivation + sample fit interview |
| 18:00-19:00 | 📚 Caso Solo speed run (25 min) | Caso completo a velocidade real |
| 20:00-20:30 | ⚡ Drills: Final mix (10 drills) | 3 calc + 3 structures + 2 market sizing + 2 creativity |
| 21:00-22:00 | 🤝 Practice Room: Último caso hard | Tipo que menos dominas. Acabar forte. |
| Hora | CaseCoach Activity | Detalhes |
|---|---|---|
| 10:15-11:00 | 📹 Rever 1 sample interview (alta performance) | Calibrar: "é assim que quero soar amanhã" |
| 11:00-12:00 | 🇵🇹 Mock PT: CRITICAL SESSION | Condições reais. Timer, sem notas, formal. |
| 13:30-14:30 | 🇵🇹 Mock PT: 2º mock | Tipo diferente. Entrevistadora tough. |
| 16:00-17:00 | 🔍 Research Target Firm (1h) | Seguir checklist Research Target Firm acima |
| 17:30-18:00 | 📚 Caso Solo confidence (fácil/médio) | Acabar o dia com VITÓRIA |
📊 CaseCoach Progress Tracker
| Recurso | Target | Progresso |
|---|---|---|
| Case Prep Course | 19/19 aulas | |
| Case Math Course | 21/21 aulas | |
| Fit Prep Course | 7/7 aulas | |
| Structure Drills | 15+ completados | |
| Calculation Drills | 15+ completados | |
| Other Drills (sizing, charts, creativity) | 15+ completados | |
| Practice Room Sessions | 6-8 completadas | |
| PT Mock Sessions | 3-4 completadas | |
| Sample Interviews watched | 3+ vistos | |
| Firm Research | Checklist completa | |
| Achievement Stories | 5-6 prepared in SCAR |
Resumo do investimento CaseCoach — 3 DIAS (Ter-Qui):
📹 ~10-12h em video courses (Case Prep 4 blocos + Math 4 blocos + Fit + 1 Sample) | ⚡ ~3h em drills (30+) | 🤝 ~5h em Practice Room (5 sessões) | 🇵🇹 ~3h com amiga PT (3 mocks) | 📚 ~3h em casos solo (3 cases) | 🔍 ~1h research da firma
≈ 25-30h de prep em 3 dias (Ter 24 → Qui 26)
O que a firm avalia no Fit:
Nota: MBB usa formato fit clássico (background + behavioral + motivation).
- Performance track record — Tens historial de impacto em ambientes exigentes?
- Transferable abilities — Persuasão, teamwork, drive, liderança, adaptabilidade
- Motivation — Porquê consultoria? Porquê esta firma especificamente?
- Presence & Communication — Rapport, profissionalismo, comunicação clara
🏢 5 Qualities MBB procura:
- Intellectual curiosity — Genuinamente curioso sobre problemas complexos
- Creative thinking — Abordagens não-convencionais
- Integrity — Honesto, transparente, ético
- Drive — Ambição, iniciativa, não espera instruções
- Collaborative mindset — Trabalha bem em equipa, eleva os outros
Prepara exemplos de cada um! MBB também avalia presence & communication ao longo de TODA a entrevista.
⏱️ Formato típico MBB Fit (10-15 min)
- Intro/Background (2-3 min) — "Walk me through your resume" ou "Tell me about yourself"
- Behavioral questions (5-8 min) — 1-2 perguntas sobre experiências/achievements. Podem focar num período específico da tua vida.
- Motivation (2-3 min) — "Why consulting?" + "Why this firm?"
- Your questions (2 min) — Perguntas ao entrevistador
História 1: Liderança / Influência
🔑 Mnemónica: [COMPANY B] — [MNEMONIC]
"Tell me about a time you led a project or influenced senior stakeholders."
S Situação: At [Company B] in [year], I was an intern on the [team name] team. The company's flagship partner event was approaching with [X]+ senior clients from top partners. The team needed someone to own a key presentation segment.
T Tarefa: I volunteered to lead the segment. The challenge: I had [X] weeks to research, build, and present original insights to an audience of [X]+ senior executives — people with 15-20 years more experience than me. No template existed.
A Ação: First, I mapped the audience — different stakeholders care about different metrics. I tailored my research to bridge both perspectives. Second, I analyzed internal data on key activation patterns using the company's analytics tools, identifying 3 counter-intuitive trends. Third, I structured the presentation as "myth vs. data" to challenge assumptions. Fourth, I rehearsed with 3 senior colleagues and incorporated their feedback. On the day, I opened with a provocative question that challenged conventional thinking."
R Resultado: Presented to [X]+ senior clients. Post-event feedback scored [X]/5. My manager said it was "the most data-driven segment we've had from an intern." The research directly fed into a dashboard I later built that projected [significant savings] across client spend optimization.
Key Qualities shown: Intellectual curiosity, drive, creative thinking, communication
História 2: Superar Desafio
🔑 Mnemónica: [COMPANY C] — [MNEMONIC]
"Tell me about a significant challenge you faced and how you overcame it."
S Situação: At [Company C] in [year], I was a Business Development intern assigned to lead the expansion into [new market] — a brand new market with zero existing accounts. I managed a large portfolio of companies. The challenge: my territory performance started significantly below the team average because I was cold-starting a new market while colleagues had mature territories.
T Tarefa: I needed to build the entire pipeline from scratch, prove the market was viable, and turn my performance metrics around — all as an intern competing against full-time employees.
A Ação: First, I did my own market research — compiled a comprehensive consulting-style report analyzing the market landscape, company territories, and conducted targeted client interviews to understand buying patterns. Second, I segmented my portfolio by size/urgency and created a prioritized outreach sequence. Third, I identified that local businesses responded better to relationship-building than pure efficiency pitches, so I adapted my messaging. Fourth, I tracked my conversion funnel daily and iterated my approach weekly.
R Resultado: Outperformed KPI benchmarks by [X]x in key metrics. Raised my territory share from significantly below to above team average, outperforming all full-time colleagues in the region. The report became a reference document for future market expansion.
Key Qualities shown: Drive, intellectual curiosity, analytical rigor, resilience
História 3: Trabalho em Equipa / Conflito
🔑 Mnemónica: [COMPANY A] — [MNEMONIC]
"Describe a situation where you had to work with someone difficult or manage a conflict."
S Situação: In [year], I co-founded [Company A], a [type] startup. After [duration] of intense building, I realized my co-founder and I had fundamentally different visions for the company's direction and pace. I was pushing for enterprise sales traction; he wanted to pivot to a different product. Tensions escalated as we both felt the other was blocking progress.
T Tarefa: I needed to navigate a co-founder disagreement without destroying the company, the relationship, or the value we'd built — including a [significant pipeline] of contracted enterprise pilots.
A Ação: First, I separated emotion from analysis. I wrote down both visions side-by-side and honestly evaluated the market evidence for each. Second, I initiated a structured conversation — not a fight — where we each presented our case with data. Third, when it became clear we couldn't align, I proposed a fair exit framework: I designed a Services Agreement and transition plan that protected both parties. Fourth, I handled the handover professionally — documenting all processes, client relationships, and the AI-powered outbound engine I'd built so nothing was lost.
R Resultado: We executed a clean exit in [month/year]. The company retained the [significant pipeline] and [X] enterprise pilots I'd built. We preserved the relationship — no legal disputes. I learned that the hardest business decisions aren't about being right; they're about being honest with yourself about what the data says. The experience taught me more about negotiation, emotional intelligence, and stakeholder management than any classroom ever could.
Key Qualities shown: Integrity, collaborative mindset, emotional intelligence, maturity
História 4: Conquista Excepcional
🔑 Mnemónica: [COMPANY A] — [MNEMONIC 2]
"What is the achievement you're most proud of?"
S Situação: After [Company B], I could have taken a safe corporate path. Instead, I co-founded [Company A] — a B2B SaaS platform connecting enterprises with tech partners. We had no funding, no network in the US market, and were competing against established players.
T Tarefa: As Chief Sales & Marketing Officer, I needed to build an entire go-to-market engine from zero — prove product-market fit, generate revenue, and create a scalable pipeline, all pre-funding.
A Ação: First, I built an AI-powered outbound engine that processed thousands of leads, automating 80% of the pipeline using a custom tech stack (various tools + automated sequences). Second, I personally ran the enterprise sales process — from cold outreach to closing, navigating 6-9 month B2B sales cycles with Fortune 500 and Big 4 firms. Third, I created all investor pitch materials and led partnership negotiations with major companies and enterprise prospects. Fourth, I closed the first paying customers, generating revenue — proving the business model worked.
R Resultado: In 11 months, built a [significant pipeline] of contracted enterprise pilots, [X] enterprise pilots including Fortune 500 and Big 4, and revenue from first paying customers — all pre-funding, with a 2-person team. This taught me that the gap between strategy and execution is where real value is created. Consultants design strategies; I've executed them. That's what I bring to consulting.
Key Qualities shown: Drive, creative thinking, execution, entrepreneurial mindset
🔑 Regras
| Tempo | 2-3 min por história. S+T=30s, A=90s, R=30s |
| Pessoa | Sempre 1ª pessoa. "Eu identifiquei..." nunca "Nós decidimos..." |
| Detalhes | "Aumentei de 12% para 31% em 3 meses" não "Melhorei os resultados" |
| Raciocínio | "Analisei a situação e percebi que o problema era X" |
| Final | Resultado quantificável + 1 frase de aprendizagem |
Porquê esta firma? — Script
"A firma atrai-me por três razões. Primeiro, pela cultura de inovação — a a firma tem sido pioneira em áreas como digital e analytics com a a área digital, que é algo que me entusiasma dado o meu background em tecnologia. Segundo, pelo impacto real — os projetos da firma não ficam na gaveta, têm implementação concreta. E terceiro, pelas pessoas — nas conversas que tive com consultores da MBB, senti uma energia e curiosidade intelectual que me identifico muito."
❓ Outras Perguntas
| Porquê consultoria? | Paixão por resolver problemas complexos, impacto, aprendizagem acelerada |
| Porquê agora? | Experiência em startup + tech deu visão prática, quero combinar com rigor analítico |
| O que trazes? | Experiência real de vendas B2B, startup, [Company B]/[Company C], perfil híbrido tech + estratégia |
| 5 anos? | Crescer na consultoria, liderar projetos, especialização em tech/digital |
⏰ Timeline
| 10:00 | Acordar. Duche. Pequeno-almoço calmo. |
| 10:30 | Ler APENAS esta folha + frameworks rápido |
| 11:00 | Andar/exercício leve (20-30 min) |
| 11:30-13:00 | Tempo livre. NÃO estudar. Relaxar. |
| 13:00 | Almoço leve (proteína + carbos complexos) |
| 14:00 | Vestir. Preparar materiais. |
| 14:30 | 🧘 Pre-interview calm routine |
| 14:45 | Sair de casa |
| 15:00 | Chegar ao local (15 min antes) |
| 15:30 | 🎯 ENTREVISTA |
📋 Checklist
- Caneta preta + caneta azul de reserva
- Bloco de notas A4 (liso, não pautado)
- Cópia do CV impressa (2 cópias)
- Garrafa de água
- ID / Cartão de Cidadão
- Telemóvel em silêncio (não vibrar)
🧠 Os 5 Mandamentos
ESTRUTURA PRIMEIRO
"Obrigado pelo caso. Deixe-me tomar um momento para organizar os meus pensamentos..."
Sempre pedir 30-60 seg. Sempre apresentar framework ANTES de mergulhar.
HIPÓTESE SEMPRE
"A minha hipótese inicial é que... vamos testar isto."
MBB ADORA hipóteses. Formula uma. Ajusta com dados novos.
MATH EM VOZ ALTA
"Então, 5 milhões dividido por 200 mil unidades dá-nos 25€ por unidade."
Nunca calcular em silêncio. Sanity check no final.
SO WHAT?
"Isto sugere que... e a implicação é..."
Depois de cada dado/cálculo, dizer o que significa. Nunca só dizer o número.
SÍNTESE NO FINAL
"Em resumo, recomendo X por três razões: primeiro... segundo... terceiro..."
Top-down. Recomendação primeiro. Depois razões. Próximos passos.
🗣️ Frases Chave
Início do Caso
- "Posso tomar um momento para estruturar?"
- "Para confirmar, o objetivo é [X], correto?"
- "Gostaria de explorar esta questão em três dimensões..."
Durante o Caso
- "Antes de continuar, gostaria de verificar se estou no caminho certo"
- "Isto é interessante porque sugere que..."
- "Poderia fornecer-me dados sobre [X]?"
- "Deixe-me resumir o que sabemos até agora..."
Quando Estás Stuck
- "Vou recuar um passo e pensar nisto de outra forma..."
- "Com a informação disponível, a minha melhor estimativa seria..."
- "Que perspetiva adicional me poderia ajudar aqui?"
Final
- "Em síntese, recomendaria [X]..."
- "As principais razões são: primeiro..., segundo..., terceiro..."
- "Como próximos passos, sugeriria..."
- "Há riscos a considerar, nomeadamente..."
💪 Mindset
Não és um candidato. És um futuro colega.
- Conversa de negócios, não exame
- Mostra como PENSAS, não o que memorizaste
- Se errares math, corrige com confiança
A tua vantagem:
- Fundaste uma empresa ([Company A]) — experiência real de negócio
- Google + Amazon — tech de ponta
- Bilingue PT/EN — mercado ibérico, África, Brasil
- Your degree — analytical training
Se sentires ansiedade:
- Respira fundo (4 seg inspira, 7 seg segura, 8 seg expira)
- Olha para o entrevistador, não para baixo
- Fala mais devagar, não mais rápido
- Lembra-te: és bom o suficiente para estar aqui. You got through the screening. You belong here.
O que o MBB quer ver:
Estrutura clara. Pensamento analítico. Pragmatismo. Comunicação confiante. Curiosidade genuína.
A coisa mais importante:
Diverte-te.
Se gostares da conversa, isso nota-se. E é contagioso.
🍀
You've got this. Good luck!
💡 "But isn't every case just about profits?"
You're partly right — every company ultimately wants profit. But the question being asked determines the structure, not the end goal. Think of it like medicine: every patient wants health, but the doctor picks a different treatment based on the symptom.
| Question Type | Why NOT just "Profitability" | Right Framework |
|---|---|---|
| "Should we enter market X?" | You need to assess market size, capability fit, and competitive dynamics before you can even estimate profit | Market Entry |
| "How should we grow?" | Growth has different levers (core vs. adjacent vs. new) that aren't captured by Revenue = P×Q | Growth |
| "Competitor just launched X" | You need to assess threat magnitude and response options — profitability is the outcome, not the analysis | Competitive Response |
| "Should we buy Company Y?" | You need standalone valuation + synergies + integration risk — much richer than cost/revenue split | M&A |
| "Our operations are slow" | Process optimization looks at bottlenecks, capacity, utilization — not revenue/cost | Process Optimization |
TL;DR: The framework matches the QUESTION, not the end goal. Profitability is for "why are profits declining?" Everything else has a more specific tool.
🔀 Interactive Framework Finder
Answer the questions below. The tree will guide you to the best framework in 2-3 clicks.
| Framework | Trigger Words in Prompt | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| 💰 Profitability | "profits declining", "margins shrinking", "losing money", "cost overruns" | Why is profit changing? |
| 📈 Growth | "grow revenue", "expand", "scale", "increase market share" | How to grow the business? |
| 📉 Cost Reduction | "cut costs", "reduce expenses", "improve efficiency", "budget pressure" | How to spend less? |
| 🚀 Market Entry | "enter market", "new geography", "new segment", "launch in" | Should we enter? How? |
| 🆕 New Product | "launch product", "new offering", "product strategy" | How to launch successfully? |
| 🏷️ Pricing | "set price", "pricing strategy", "premium vs value" | What should we charge? |
| 💼 Investment | "invest in", "CapEx decision", "ROI", "build vs buy" | Is this worth the investment? |
| 🤝 M&A | "acquire", "merger", "buy company", "target valuation" | Should we buy? At what price? |
| ⚔️ Competitive Response | "competitor launched", "price war", "market share loss to rival" | How to respond to threat? |
| ⚙️ Process Optimization | "operations slow", "bottleneck", "capacity", "improve throughput" | How to fix the process? |
📊 Types of Case Structures
Cases vary not just by industry, but by structure — the types of sections the interviewer presents. Select a case type to see what to expect:
| Section | What Happens | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Structuring | You hear the prompt, ask clarifying questions, take 60s to structure, present your issue tree | ~5 min |
| 2. Analysis (1-2 exhibits) | Interviewer shares 1-2 charts/tables. You interpret data, do light math, give "so what" | ~10 min |
| 3. Math Calculation | One focused calculation (break-even, market sizing, ROI) | ~5 min |
| 4. Synthesis | Recommendation to CEO using Pyramid structure + risks + next steps | ~5 min |
📌 This is the most common MBB case format. ~70% of first-round cases follow this pattern.
🎯 Step 0: Clarifying Questions (AIM Framework)
Before structuring, you have 2-3 questions to ask. The AIM test starts here — your questions should reveal the client's REAL goal and scope.
✅ GOOD Clarifying Questions (help you structure):
| Category | Example Question | Why It Helps |
|---|---|---|
| Client's Goal | "Is the primary objective to restore profitability to prior levels, or is there a specific margin target?" | Tells you whether this is a turnaround or optimization |
| Scope | "Are we looking at the entire business, or a specific division/product line?" | Prevents you from boiling the ocean |
| Timeline | "Is there a time horizon in mind? Quick wins vs structural changes?" | Affects whether you recommend operational vs strategic fixes |
| Business Model | "Could you give me a quick sense of the product range and customer segments?" | Helps you tailor the structure to THEIR business (Insightful) |
| Constraints | "Are there any options off the table — layoffs, price increases, market exits?" | Prevents you from recommending something they've already ruled out |
🚫 BAD Clarifying Questions (waste your time):
- "What industry is the client in?" — They just told you
- "What are their revenues?" — Already in the prompt
- "Who are their competitors?" — You'll find this out later in the case
- "What's the market like?" — Too broad. Ask about a specific aspect.
- Restating the entire case back — The interviewer knows what they said
🎯 The AIM Clarifying Test:
Every question you ask should pass this: "Will this answer change my structure?" If no, don't ask it. You only get 2-3 questions — make them count.
"Thank you. Before I structure my approach, I'd like to ask a few clarifying questions:"
1. "When you say profits declined 25% — is that operating profit or net profit? And are there any one-off items I should be aware of?"
→ This scopes the problem: one-off write-down vs recurring deterioration
2. "Could you tell me a bit about the product portfolio? Are all products affected equally, or is the decline concentrated?"
→ This makes your structure Insightful — you'll tailor to the product mix
3. "Is there a target the CEO has in mind — return to prior 20% margin, or a different threshold?"
→ Answer-focused: you need the goal to prioritize recommendations
[After interviewer answers, you transition smoothly into structuring]
📋 THE CASE — EcoBottle Inc.
Our client is EcoBottle, a
mid-sized European manufacturer of reusable water bottles. They have
€120M in annual revenue and
have been profitable for the last 10 years.
Over the past
18 months, profits have declined by 25%
despite revenue remaining roughly flat. The CEO has hired the firm to
understand
why profits are falling and what to do about it.
How would you approach this?
🅰️ Section 1: Structuring (The First 60 Seconds)
🎯 AIM Test — Your structure must be: Answer-focused (addresses the question), Insightful (tailored to client), MECE (no overlaps, no gaps).
⏱️ Take 60 seconds of silence. Say: "Let me take a minute to structure my thoughts." The interviewer EXPECTS this. Don't rush.
📝 Write it down. Draw your issue tree on paper while thinking. You'll present from it.
🔑 Framework Selection: The prompt says "profits declining + revenue flat" → this is a Profitability case. The equation: Profit = Revenue - Costs. Since revenue is flat, the problem is likely on the COST side. But you MUST check both.
🚫 DON'T: Just list "Revenue and Costs" generically. Tailor it to EcoBottle — mention manufacturing, raw materials, distribution. Show you listened to the brief.
"Thank you. Let me take a minute to organize my thoughts."
[60 seconds of silence — write issue tree]
"To understand EcoBottle's profit decline, I'd structure my analysis around two main areas:
1. REVENUE — You mentioned revenue is roughly flat, but I'd want to dig deeper:
- Price: Have average selling prices changed? Any discounting pressure?
- Volume: Is unit volume stable? Any mix shift toward lower-margin products?
- Product mix: EcoBottle may have multiple product lines — are the profitable ones growing or shrinking?
2. COSTS — Since revenue is flat but profits fell 25%, this is likely where the problem sits:
- Variable costs: Raw materials (plastics, stainless steel), manufacturing, packaging, logistics
- Fixed costs: Rent, salaries, overhead — any recent hires or facility expansions?
- One-off costs: Any restructuring, write-downs, or investments?
I'd prioritize the COST side given the revenue clue, and I'd want to separate the 18-month timeline into periods to spot when the decline started.
Shall I start with the cost analysis?"
🅱️ Section 2: Exhibits & Math Calculation
📊 EXHIBIT — EcoBottle Cost Breakdown (€M)
Year 1 (Prior) Year 2 (Current) Change
Revenue €120M €122M +1.7%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Raw Materials €32M €44M +37.5%
Manufacturing Labor €18M €19M +5.6%
Packaging & Logistics €14M €18M +28.6%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total Variable Costs €64M €81M +26.6%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Rent & Facilities €12M €12M 0%
Salaries & Overhead €20M €21M +5%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Total Fixed Costs €32M €33M +3.1%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
TOTAL COSTS €96M €114M +18.8%
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
PROFIT €24M €8M -66.7%
Margin 20.0% 6.6% -13.4pp
The interviewer asks: "What do you see? What's driving the profit decline?"
📐 Read the exhibit for 15-20 seconds before speaking. Say: "Let me take a moment to review this."
🔍 The 3-step approach:
- HEADLINE: What's the big picture message? (Profit crashed)
- DRIVER: Which line items changed most? (Raw materials +37.5%, Packaging +28.6%)
- SO WHAT: What does this mean for the client? Why? Next steps?
🧮 Quick Math Check:
- Profit drop: €24M → €8M = €16M decline
- Revenue change: +€2M (negligible)
- Cost change: +€18M (this is the culprit)
- Biggest cost driver: Raw materials +€12M (75% of the €16M loss!)
- Second: Packaging & logistics +€4M (25% of the loss)
🚫 DON'T just read numbers aloud. The interviewer can read. Add interpretation and business insight.
"Let me review this for a moment."
[15 seconds]
HEADLINE: "Profit has dropped from €24M to €8M — a 67% decline — while revenue is essentially flat at €122M. This confirms our hypothesis: it's a cost problem, not a revenue problem."
KEY DRIVER: "Total costs increased by €18M. Breaking that down:
- Raw materials alone account for €12M of the €18M increase — that's two-thirds of the entire cost overrun
- Packaging & logistics added another €4M
- Fixed costs barely moved — just €1M
SO WHAT: "This is overwhelmingly a variable cost problem, concentrated in raw materials. My hypotheses would be:
- Commodity price inflation (steel, plastics globally more expensive?)
- Supplier-specific issue (lost negotiation leverage? switched suppliers?)
- Product mix change (shifted to more expensive materials like stainless steel?)
I'd want to investigate which of these three is the root cause. Can you tell me if raw material prices have moved globally in this period?"
🅲 Section 3: Synthesis & Recommendation
The interviewer says:
"You're right — global steel prices rose 40% and the company didn't hedge or renegotiate. They also shifted 30% of production to premium stainless steel bottles without adjusting pricing. What would you recommend to the CEO?"
📋 Use the Pyramid structure: Lead with the answer.
- SITUATION (1 sentence) — remind them of the problem
- FINDING (1-2 sentences) — your diagnosis
- RECOMMENDATION (2-3 points) — prioritized by impact & timeline
- RISKS & MITIGATIONS (2-3 bullet points) — what could go wrong and how to handle it
- NEXT STEPS (1-2 sentences) — what you'd do next week
⏱️ Keep it under 90 seconds. CEOs want clarity, not exhaustiveness.
💪 Be decisive. Don't say "maybe" or "it depends." Pick a side and defend it. You can add nuance, but lead with conviction.
🔢 Use numbers. "This could save €8-10M" is way better than "significant savings."
SITUATION: "EcoBottle's profits fell 67% — from €24M to €8M — while revenue stayed flat."
FINDING: "The root cause is a €12M increase in raw material costs, driven by two factors: unhedged exposure to a 40% global steel price increase, and a shift to premium stainless steel without corresponding price adjustments."
RECOMMENDATION — I'd propose three actions, in priority order:
- IMMEDIATE (0-3 months): Raise prices on the premium stainless steel line by 15-20%. These products target eco-conscious consumers with higher willingness to pay — we're essentially giving away margin. Estimated recovery: €3-5M annually.
- SHORT-TERM (3-6 months): Renegotiate supplier contracts and implement commodity hedging. Lock in 12-month fixed-price contracts for steel and plastic. Potential savings: €4-6M based on volume leverage.
- MEDIUM-TERM (6-12 months): Optimize the product portfolio — analyze which SKUs are margin-positive after the cost increase. Consider discontinuing the lowest-margin variants and focusing on the sweet spot between volume and margin.
NEXT STEPS: "This week, I'd start with a customer price sensitivity analysis for the premium line, and simultaneously request three competing bids from alternative steel suppliers to establish negotiation leverage."
RISKS & MITIGATIONS:
- Risk: Price increase on premium line could reduce volume → Mitigation: Run an A/B test on one region first; eco-conscious consumers tend to have lower price elasticity
- Risk: Supplier renegotiation takes time while costs keep rising → Mitigation: Short-term hedging immediately, parallel-track supplier diversification
- Risk: Discontinuing SKUs may lose shelf space at retailers → Mitigation: Keep the SKU slots but replace lowest-margin products with higher-margin alternatives
📌 Master Tips — Apply to EVERY Case
| # | CaseCoach Principle | How to Apply |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Take time to think | 60s for structure, 15-20s before exhibit analysis. Silence is OK. |
| 2 | Lead with the headline | Never start with details. Start: "The key finding is..." then support. |
| 3 | Quantify everything | "€12M of €18M" > "most of the increase." Always fraction and percentage. |
| 4 | Hypothesis-driven | State your hypothesis early: "I suspect this is a cost problem." Then test it. |
| 5 | Case leadership | Suggest where to go next: "Shall I explore costs?" Don't wait to be told. |
| 6 | Tailor to the client | Use the client's name and industry. "EcoBottle's raw materials" > "COGS" |
| 7 | AIM every structure | Answer-focused, Insightful, MECE. Miss one = weak structure. |
| 8 | Pyramid your synthesis | Answer → Supporting points → Next steps. Never bottom-up (building to the answer). |
| 9 | Be creative in recommendations | Don't just say "reduce costs." HOW? Which costs? By how much? What trade-offs? |
| 10 | End strong — next steps | Always close with "This week I'd...". Shows you're actionable, not theoretical. |
🧑💼 Personality Fit — Prepare in Advance
Format: Present → Past → Future. ~90-120 seconds. Confident, natural, conversational.
"I'm [Your Name], [age], [nationality]. I'm currently [your current situation — role, transition, etc.].
Before that, I [describe 2-3 key professional experiences with specific metrics and impact].
My education includes [degrees, universities, exchanges].
What draws me to [Firm Name] is [specific reason tied to the firm's values/culture]. I've spent [timeframe] [doing what] — now I want to [your consulting aspiration]."
⏱️ Timing Guide:
- Present (15s): Who you are now, current situation
- Past highlights (60s): 2-3 key experiences with 1 metric each — [Your top 3 companies]
- Education (10s): One sentence, signal quality
- Future / Why this firm (20s): What you want + why it fits
⚠️ Common Mistakes:
- Going chronological from childhood — START with the present
- Listing every role — pick the 2-3 most impressive
- No metrics — always have 1 number per experience
- Over-explaining exits — keep it positive: "clean exit after [X] months"
- Forgetting the "why this firm" landing — always end on why you're here
Rule: 2-3 min each. S+T = 30s, A = 90s, R = 30s. Always 1st person. Always quantified result + 1 learning.
| # | Story | Mnemonic | Key Metric | Covers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Company B] — Major Presentation | [COMPANY B] — [MNEMONIC] | [X] clients, [X]/5, [significant impact] | Leadership, Influence, Communication |
| 2 | [Company C] — Market Expansion | [COMPANY C] — [MNEMONIC] | [X]x KPI, [X] accounts, below→above avg | Challenge, Resilience, Drive |
| 3 | [Company A] — Major Challenge | [COMPANY A] — [MNEMONIC] | [pipeline] preserved, clean exit | Teamwork, Conflict, Integrity |
| 4 | [Company A] — Key Achievement | [COMPANY A] — [MNEMONIC 2] | [pipeline], [X] pilots, revenue | Achievement, Entrepreneurship, Creative Thinking |
🎯 Story Selection Guide:
| If they ask about... | Use story |
|---|---|
| "Leadership" / "Influence" / "Led a project" | #1 [Company B] — major presentation/impact |
| "Challenge" / "Failure" / "Difficulty" | #2 [Company C] — market expansion/KPI achievement below average |
| "Conflict" / "Difficult person" / "Teamwork" | #3 [Company A] — leadership challenge disagreement |
| "Proudest achievement" / "Impact" | #4 [Company A] — revenue/growth achievement |
| "Tell me about a time you took initiative" | #1 or #4 — both show proactive initiative |
| "Analytical thinking" / "Data-driven" | #2 [Company C] — comprehensive report, targeted interviews |
MBB fit is 10-15 min: Background (2-3 min) + Behavioral (5-8 min) + Motivation (2-3 min) + Your Qs (2 min)
🔵 Background / Intro (almost always asked)
- "Walk me through your resume." → Use your 2-min intro
- "Tell me about yourself." → Same 2-min intro, slightly more personal
- "What have you been doing since [last role]?" → Honest: job search + interview prep + reflecting on next chapter
🟠 Behavioral (1-2 of these, expect the hardest)
- "Tell me about a time you led a team or influenced without authority." → Story #1 ([Company B])
- "Describe a significant challenge you faced." → Story #2 ([Company C])
- "Tell me about a time you dealt with conflict or disagreement." → Story #3 ([Company A] Challenge)
- "What is your proudest achievement?" → Story #4 ([Company A] Achievement)
- "Tell me about a time you failed." → Adapt Story #2 or #3 — frame as learning
- "Give an example of when you showed initiative." → Story #1 or #4
- "Tell me about a complex analytical problem you solved." → Story #2 (comprehensive report, targeted interviews)
- "How did you convince someone who initially disagreed with you?" → Story #1 or #3
🟢 Motivation (almost always asked)
- "Why consulting?" → Passion for solving complex problems + impact + accelerated learning. Bridge: "I've executed strategy in startups, now I want to design it at scale."
- "Why this firm specifically?" → Culture of innovation, digital capabilities, real implementation, intellectual curiosity of the people.
- "Why now (after a startup)?" → "I've seen the gap between strategy and execution firsthand. I want the firm's toolkit to close that gap for companies at scale."
- "Where do you see yourself in 5 years?" → Growing within consulting, leading projects, specializing in tech/digital transformation.
🟣 Curveball Questions (less common but be ready)
- "What would your co-founder say about you?" → Driven, analytical, sometimes too fast. I learned to slow down and listen.
- "What's your biggest weakness?" → Impatience with slow processes — I've learned that in consulting, building consensus IS the process.
- "If you don't get into consulting, what would you do?" → Tech sales leadership at a top company (Google, etc.) — but consulting is my priority because of the breadth of impact.
MBB evaluates presence & communication throughout the ENTIRE interview — not just in the fit section. Here's what they're looking for:
| Quality | What it looks like | Your natural advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Confidence | Firm handshake, eye contact, steady speaking pace, no filler words | [Company B] (presentations), [Company A] (pitches) |
| Warmth / Rapport | Genuine smiles, interest in interviewer, not robotic | You're naturally personable — use it. Ask about their firm experience. |
| Intellectual Curiosity | Asking "why" before jumping to answers, genuine interest in the case | Your startup experience gave you real business curiosity |
| Structured Communication | "I'd break this into three parts..." — never rambling | Practice: every answer should have a number upfront |
| Coachability | Takes hints gracefully, adjusts when redirected, doesn't argue | Say: "That's a great point, let me reconsider..." and pivot |
| Energy / Drive | Leaning forward, enthusiastic about the problem, not passive | Built an impressive pipeline from zero — channel that energy |
✅ Pre-Interview Mindset Reset:
- You're not there to impress — you're there to have an interesting business conversation
- The interviewer WANTS you to succeed — they need to fill the position
- You've handled major presentations before. This is ONE person. You've done harder.
- Treat the case like a real problem you're solving with a colleague — not an exam